Whoops that was probably me. I take it you got better knowledge of that spot?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/58777230

I don't think a full revert is necessary in a lot of cases. Parks tend to be paths, but I think most people would lean towards connections to picnic spots and playgrounds to be footways (but not sidewalks; those are the footway next to a vehicular way like a street or cycleway).

Sure, basically, if it only allows foot traffic or designed only for foot traffic, it's highway=footway (add bicycle=yes if bicycles are allowed). If it's designed as a multiuse path, it's highway=path. If it's a cycleway (biggest way to tell that this is the case is if it has signage and/or pavement markings), then highway=cycleway (and add foot=yes if pedestrians are allowed).

I changed this over to shop=charity, which seems to be a better fit for thrift shops.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/58734853

The park path looks good now, but the sidewalk would qualify as a footway.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/58721121

footways or paths?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/58698729

footways or paths?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/58698171

Footways or paths?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/58666415

footways or paths?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/58666069

footway or path?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/58664989

footway or path?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/58658431

Footway or path?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/58649582

footway or path?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/58647873

OK 51 is secondary through here (it's not a US highway).
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/58647220

footway or path?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/58634404

footway or path?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/58633689

Missed intersections here and I'm not convinced the ways internal to the parks aren't paths, not footways.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/58632555

paths are not (exclusively) footways, but footways do preclude non-foot travel (ie, by bicycle) by design. Void of any on the ground restrictions, these appear to be paths, not footways.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/58631907

paths are not (exclusively) footways, but footways do preclude non-foot travel (ie, by bicycle) by design. Void of any on the ground restrictions, these appear to be paths, not footways.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/58631907

Please attach land use areas only to the outline of the area, not the road centerlines.