Enough to tell what was going on, I've edited this spot again in an guess on what you were going for.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/58427557

Is that object with the odd geometry a park or a playground, by 177th and Silvehawk? While not impossible that it's also a park, it definitely looks like a playground, but in either case could use a little refinement on the shape. Is the pond at 178th and Silvehawk new?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/58416919

Same as previous changeset regarding footway vs path.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/58416460

Little hard to tell from aerial imagery and I'm not super familiar with the area, but highway=footway is something that implies it's either a sidewalk or has no bicycle access. If bicycles are allowed and it's not a sidewalk, it's probably a path.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/58412991

Wow, swing and a hit there! Off to a good start!
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/58412506

That would be a path.

Right, a path would be most appropriate versus footway, which is geared only to pedestrians (or might be open to bikes but isn't designed to handle any real volume of bikes).

name=* should only be the name.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/58387880

It doesn't look like any lanes are marked on Wireless Way, only ways with marked lanes get lanes tags.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/58386279

This definitely looks like a concrete bridge on the aerial, and definitely not a footway.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/58385494

I can see signage for cyclists in the shadows, this is definitely not a footway.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/58384525

It looks like this actually is a track.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/58384496

Dirt cycleways are rather not typical, but a dirt path would be more likely, with bicycle=* and foot=* tags as appropriate.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/58384338

Is access=destination correct? That would make sense if "No through traffic" is posted. Also looks like it's correct to have it as a track on the one you changed to footway. Maybe highway=path, but looks like it's suitable for getting a truck down it to maintain the place. So motor_vehicle=no might be better if cars aren't generally allowed.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/58384220

Looks like the driveways along the northeast side of Fort Sill might need a closer look. I'm trying to untangle it now, but looks like you connected them to the Fort Sill boundary line instead of the road.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/58355845

OK, uploading another changeset right now for Bella Vista Bypass.

No problem, I'm working from DG Premium then, and aligning it to the GPS traces available.

Sounds good, I'm looking on DigitalGlobe Premium; is that still accurate imagery for the route?

Crystal Beach Park is already mapped, plus keep in mind proper capitalization and spelling counts, as do putting the tags on the outline object. Please avoid attaching area outlines to road centerlines.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/58299316

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/58250093 where the changeset comment is: I'm reasonably certain I did not hallucinate seeing this school when I passed it earlier this week.