Did the roads line up with GPX, or was aerial the only available information?

Instead of highway=residential, name=Pvt Drive, try this instead:

highway=service
access=private
(don't include any name tag).

Also please be aware that abbreviations in names are frowned on as automated systems can't expand abbreviations reliably, but can render abbreviations from full words if desired.

For my own attempts at similar efforts in my new homeland, I'm curious where this data was sourced and how it was conflated into OSM.

Is this a RV park or a trailer park or is it both?

Where the way is one lane wide and the rails are congruent with the way, it shouldn't be a problem to have the tags for both to share a single way. I'm afraid I'm not familiar with the routes in the TriMet system as they lay at the moment.

This really seems like this might have been a personal map rather than something that was intended to be shared globally. Some things here don't make sense if you're looking for amenities. Do you need help cleaning this up for more universal usefulness?

Nice catch, reminds me to map out the driveways and check the neighborhood since I know it could use a little work through there.

No idea. Given that they kind of looked like something the city sign shop would improvise, and they're painted the same DOT pale green as the overpasses and the (city improvised, but now world famous) Portland staple racks.

Yes, the volume of cyclists arriving or departing at PDX is relatively large for most cities, as nobody drives a car, there's too much motor traffic, and there's nonstop flights to Amsterdam. I imagine legal weed in Oregons probably going to slow that a bit. One is outside between a smoking area and the MAX line (which should be called Airport Branch, not Metropolitan Area Express), and the other is inside next to the baggage claim KLM usually drops at. Arrivals sidewalk is rather broader than departures and tucked under the departures level owing to the idea that you might be standing outside longer and with more people on that level than the upper one.

Reverting this change as it's brigning nothing to the table. Check the wiki for the right way to do whatever it was you were trying to do.

Please refrain from setting names on ways that do not have names. US 64 is a ref, not a name, and was already properly tagged.

Thanks for this fixup. Would be nice if Metro would give some proper route numbers to the member routes in this network and call the walking part different from the biking part so they can be logically mapped. I may be asking for too much out of the ground truth, realistically...

Eeeeh, I'd say Bixby is more of a "suburb" and Coweta's the small end of a "town." Wagoner County classifies Coweta as a "town".

Plus it seems like "chicken" would be a more established tag.

The name=* tags on this changeset sound suspiciously like a conflation of ref=* and description=*. Please don't do that: The name should only be the name, not ref, direction, description or other qualities.

Is Trinity Parkway actually happening? Last I heard, TXDOT was scrapping it as it was too close to the 183 Freeway to do anything other than increase congestion at it's interchanges and reduce usable space downtown.

Thanks for the translation. In the future, please use useful changeset comments, such as "adding Russian translation".

Very good point.

You may want to get in contact with the original user and see if you can't get a more exact location on him.

You can probably demote MN 210 to secondary as it's a state highway.