OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
179027094

Great work, though it would be helpful to pedestrians if you also included the street names on the sidewalks.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179027094

179059351

Uuh, you got it backwards, semicolons separate multiple values, not slashes.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179059351

179234248

Seems like an awful lot of ways that really just needed alignment and reclassification got deleted here.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179234248

179234248

Seems like a lot of stuff from the TIGER imports that really only needed minor retagging and alignment work got wholesale deleted here. Am I missing something?

179067493

It's a good idea to include the street names on sidewalks.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179067493

178705219

Exactly.

178554483

Also removing the street name and speed limits that obviously don't apply.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178554483

178554483

access=private and mapping the gate are also good ideas in such a case.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178554483

178705219

Including the name=* on the sidewalks is a good idea (for the same reasons that divided roadways have names on both sides).
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178705219

178693432

Could you take another look at this camera, please? The road and stop sign got moved out of alignment, and I moved it back, but I'm not aware of the camera you were mapping and can't hope to re-add that one accurately as a result of moving the stop sign and road back.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178693432

178569062

Trailers that are used in lieu of buildings should be building=static_caravan; building=house implies a permanent structure.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178569062

178470871

I think we should, it's only going to mess with people.

178470871

Nice catch, though I gotta wonder if that Old Sapulpa Road suggestion from TIGER isn't straight up wrong. My understanding is Old Sapulpa Road is an alternative name for Frankoma Road and Southwest Boulevard southwest of Red Fork.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178470871

178430835

Generally best if cadastre tags don't follow other landuses like roadways that aren't part of the landuse being mapped.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178430835

178382459

This probably needs to be doublechecked since that appears to be way out in the middle of the street.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178382459

178383638

I think landuse=farmland is for crops, landuse=meadow for grazing.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178383638

178405177

In a lot of these cases, just adding parking=street_side would have been a faster fix.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178405177

177903313

If there's no lane markings (and it doesn't look like there are from the Mapbox aerial), then lane_markings=no are what you want, and no lanes=2.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177903313

177903480

You might be missing building=detached (if this is a house). Buildings are a good basic object to put address information on.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177903480

177903528

Generally speaking, adding addr:* to highway=* objects doesn't really have expected results.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177903528