Is this in the right spot? It appears to be on the lawn of a private home.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177572844

Could you doublecheck the location of this? It appears to have been added in the dead center of a paved intersection where putting a pole is highly unlikely.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177538601

I don't think Maxar is a valid source for edits after July 2023. osm.wiki/Maxar
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177490396

Aaah, OK, I get what you're saying now. In which case, it's probably best to just remove bicycle=* and foot=* in this case (since highway=cycleway implies bicycle=designated, foot=yes in this country).

Probably not! I'm curious which imagery you're using; most likely one or more imagery layers is slightly out of alignment and just lining up the imagery with the map and moving the camera to match fixes the problem.

Oh no worries! I might have missed that I wasn't looking at the most recent version of the object in question. Nobody's exactly going to be upset about good faith efforts like yours, I just don't have recent enough imagery to see the camera or I'd have lined it up myself!

highway=cycleway already implies foot=yes, bicycle=yes.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177481319

Splitting ways in a manner consistent with how streets get named and a lot more care to the shape of the centerline would be greatly appreciated.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177458347

This node appears in the middle of the street. If you're referring to the video detection camera on the signal mast arm, that's not a Flock camera but a video traffic detection camera (which is not recording, just looking for cars, trucks, bicycles and motorcycles waiting for the light to change).
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177454663

This looks like it got realigned through an abandoned and blocked off lot.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176537741

Please doublecheck position, this seems to be in the middle of the street.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177345959

This is in the middle of a paved intersection where adding a camera would be physically impossible.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177227447

This is in the middle of a paved intersection where adding a camera would be physically impossible.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177321090

This is in the middle of a paved intersection where adding a camera would be physically impossible.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177321059

This is in the middle of a paved intersection where adding a camera would be physically impossible.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177316422

This bridge appears to be in good shape according to state data. Is this bridge closed for construction or closed permanently? Do you have a link?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177309327

Objects should be added at their actual location, not just assumed to be at the bridge footing. MUTCD standards and common sense usually puts barriers considerably further from workzones.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177309580

Objects should be added at their actual location, not just assumed to be at the bridge footing. MUTCD standards and common sense usually puts barriers considerably further from workzones.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177309580

Is this bridge closed permanently or is it closed for construction?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177308809

Any idea if the construction=yes still applies to these objects?