Describing your edit in the changeset comment would be useful information.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167264726

"Updating golf course features" would be a better changeset comment. Please provide some descriptive changeset comments.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167321307

A considerably better changeset comment would be "Adding golf course features." This gives other editors an idea of what the goal of your edit was.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167314826

As placed, this would put the camera in a traffic lane.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167075494

As placed, this would put the camera in the middle of a traffic lane.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167075456

Tags are missing.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167075358

I'm open for suggestions, I'm just shallow on them after getting shot down on shop=buildings

I retagged this with what is most likely what was intended.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166443352

"South" and "Avenue" shouldn't be abbreviated when tagging addresses.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166321724

A changeset comment that describes what reality you're trying to reflect is very appreciated.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166315950

Just for clarification on opening hours, I see you entered 24/7. Is this location actually open 24/7? Like, can I show up at 3AM on Christmas Day and expect the office to be open? If not, 24/7 is probably the wrong value.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166293679

"Highway 6 South" is not a valid name, neither is "State Highway 6 South". These are refs, specifically called out in the wiki guidelines about names as being invalid. The official name would be the correct entry for name in this case. Where a highway has no name, only a number, then noname=yes would be appropriate. Duplicating the ref value in name is never the correct name value.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165747728

Hi there! Looks like you're trying to add a house to the map. I'm guessing the address number is 7851, correct? Is the house actually named or no?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166127678

Aaah, StreetComplete was asking for the address numbers. I've moved those building numbers to the ref=* tag, StreetComplete will probably prompt for the address numbers again. These probably all start with 85, 86 or 87 this far out.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166120893

Were these house numbers supposed to be building numbers by chance?
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166120893

Ref=* information is not a name and shouldn't be in name tags like alt_name.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165747728

Those appear to be in the correct position already. Or at least close enough given the circumstances.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165807843

Including when leaving the subdivision on the southbound side? That'd be a very unusual case.

If the exit gate opens for anybody pulling up to it, it might be more permissive than private in that one direction.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165647535

Not bad, though addr:street shouldn't contain abbreviations. You can check out https://openingh.openstreetmap.de/evaluation_tool/?lng=en for tips on how to get opening hours correct.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165597570