OpenStreetMap
Baloo Uriza's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 163063568 | Road refs should use ref=* regardless of network. Also you straight up deleted some refs without replacing them with another tag. There's some good stuff here but this might need a do-over.
|
|
| 163057570 | You can save yourself some overtracing by using multipolygons.
|
|
| 162956384 | asphalt sidewalks?
|
|
| 162952814 | Spelling out "Place" instead of "Pl" is good since computers can't tell if that's supposed to be Place or Plaza, but can abbreviate both easily.
|
|
| 162964686 | If you need branch information displayed on your rendering, change your renderer, not the map. Branch information does not belong in the name tag, only the name does. |
|
| 162885123 | We use "West" and "Street" instead, because computers are good at creating abbreviations when needed but doesn't know "Street" from "Saint" from "Sainte".
|
|
| 162596609 | The name needs to only be the name, not branch information, as previously indicated. |
|
| 162595883 | The name needs to only be the name, not branch information, as previously indicated. |
|
| 162576129 | Take another look for a better way to tag that.
|
|
| 162584738 | Please don't add branch location to the name, that's what the branch=* tag is for. Name is only the name, branch is only the branch. |
|
| 162411031 | Does the parking garage actually have a name? If not that seems more like a description than a name value.
|
|
| 162237145 | Mixed case is preferred.
|
|
| 162211927 | foot=private is redundant on access=private (which applies to all modes). Might be worth splitting at the gate and removing the access/foot tags from the part north of the gate so the street access to Young Place and the apartment complex isn't blocked by a "private" street.
|
|
| 162107843 | You can save yourself some serious time drawing by reusing lines instead of drawing over lines. In order to make several lines a single object, you would need to make a multipolygon relation. osm.wiki/Relation:multipolygon You can find working examples of this at relation/18643736 and surrounding vicinity.
|
|
| 162139928 | foot=designated would mean that there are signs or pavement markings indicating that route is not only open to pedestrians, but the preferred route for pedestrians. Removing foot=designated from the road and then foot=private (no access without permission) is probably what you're looking for.
|
|
| 162174760 | Nice addition. Though "name=Potential Hiking Trail?" should probably be a "note=*" tag. Names should only be the names. osm.wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only
|
|
| 162007197 | StreetComplete might be an easier way than Osmand for adding locations easily.
|
|
| 161988482 | Did the yellow bumpy things get removed on one or both ends of the crossing? In both the Mapbox and Bing imagery it looks like there's tactile paving on both sides but I think that imagery is from 2022.
|
|
| 161954561 | OK. As long as there's no "🚷" or "crosswalk closed" sign, that would make it an unmarked and uncontrolled crosswalk here. All sides of all intersections are crosswalks unless otherwise signed in Oklahoma. |
|
| 161954561 | Did they add a "Crosswalk Closed" sign here recently? If not, then this would be a legal, uncontrolled, unmarked crosswalk.
|