OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
60205755

I'm glad someone rolled this back, probably would have been a bit suspect if I had.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/60205755

60133523

You're probably boned, since the internet doesn't forget and public records entities like your local government are likely to re-add the address to the map anyway.

But what is clear is randomly editing OpenStreetMap is not the way to accomplish your goal, and degrades the map for everyone.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/60133523

60056945

There seems to be a trend in your changesets in unnecessarily upgrading highway=* tags where it's not warranted.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/60056945

60128403

Don't abbreviate in name=*, so instead of SW, use Southwest.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/60128403

60128121

Where in the world did you ever get the idea Guymon changed its name?
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/60128121

60110535

Found the split in the curve to the new name. Also found the extension.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/60110535

60078668

Elwood's not really major enough to warrant an upgrade.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/60078668

60033920

OK 11 actually does traverse the link.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/60033920

60019889

height=0 implies a two-dimensional object, probably not what was intended.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/60019889

60019777

Looks OK, but adding name=Test and removing building=yes doesn't look so good.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/60019777

60006202

William Charles Martin Park?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/60006202

59948539

Doesn't look bad, but lanes shouldn't be used on laneless streets.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/59948539

59874377

This is still closed and under construction.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/59874377

59874124

Wow, that was some sloppy geometry.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/59874124

59854736

Close, but don't bind closed area edges to the road centerlines

59842222

Not sure how much interest you have in Oklahoma County, but I'm working on https://tasks.openstreetmap.us/project/11 right now.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/59842222

59796231

The correct format for phone tags would be phone= 1-xxx-yyy-zzz, not (xxx) yyy-zzzz
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/59796231

59791171

Kind of an OK start, but landuse should be for the full lot, not individual buildings (building=residential works for residential buildings).
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/59791171

59779952

1-918-258-7878 would be the correct format for phone tags.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/59779952

59754704

Description covered it, no need to tag a name if it doesn't have a name.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/59754704