OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
58119494

Was the new alignment a short-term deal? I believe the curve you removed was a permanent change to the road. I'll try to survey this tomorrow.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/58119494

58077110

There was some, but it's more or less come down to big areas as a general starting point, but mapping for precision is better. talk-de had a pretty lengthy conversation about it that made it into osm-weekly this week as well.

58104372

Are you very interested in mapping Transit in general? MTTA has a lot of really weird routes that dogleg and have variations that only run certain times of day with the same number, and I'm not 100% on how to deal with that.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/58104372

58104372

Thanks for the heads up on this one. I'm checking this as I think the 118 got swapped out.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/58104372

58077110

Ideally, landuse matches the landuse, not a whole neighborhood, eg, not crossing roads.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/58077110

58072269

Not super familiar with rural route addresses, but is the city name part of the first line address? If not, addr:city would be a better place for that. Likewise, no need to put the city name in the name of a chain, ie, Love's. addr:city will disambiguate for data consumers that don't georeference the nearest town.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/58072269

58066785

Thanks for the assist on that, do you know where the ends of the 45 zone are, so I can get the missing bits?
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/58066785

58037698

Are we mapping unpaved roads as track again?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/58037698

58014354

Fixed 520 Pine, since the whole address was in the addr:street key.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/58014354

58010395

addr:housenumber should be just the number, ie, "36", and the phone number should be ITU e.123 format, ie, " 1-918-884-3550". In either case, this was also already mapped

58008014

Landuse areas don't get glued to streets, but to the actual edge of the landuse. Ideally, split into smaller areas than entire neighborhoods where the landuse changes, ie, due to a road crossing through, etc.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/58008014

57981660

Looks like addr:housename is indeed getting picked up. https://i.imgur.com/ktq88Q8.png
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/57981660

57976724

Looks like there's multiple items in the Tulsa and Sapulpa areas (Two bridges, two streets and an expressway) that you missed.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/57976724

57971941

osm.wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/57971941

57957811

Did this ramp reopen? I might have missed that memo from OklaDOT.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/57957811

57957554

landuse=grass should be landcover=grass.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/57957554

57957538

Looks like you edited on two continents?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/57957538

57948572

Some of these buildings have some geometry that's not congruent with what's available on recent aerial imagery. Might want to refine the shapes a bit.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/57948572

57947997

Phone numbers use ITU E.123 format. So, instead of (580) 555-1212, it would be 1-580-555-1212.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/57947997

57925478

Might doublecheck the Bella Vista Bypass, I'm thinking that's probably more like a trunk (even the divided sections) east of it's last interchange with another motorway (if any). Connecting surface streets to motorways directly without a ramp is definitely incorrect.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/57925478