Not bad, though Oklahoma doesn't have a major/minor concept for stop signs.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133054322

Please refrain from including advertising copy when adding items to OpenStreetMap. OSM is not an appropriate venue for that.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133285653

The goal of OpenStreetMap is to provide an accurate map of the world, not a game board. Was the original boundary the correct boundary of the air force base? If so, then that's where the boundary belongs, not where you moved it to.

Concerns about pokemon spawn points should be directed to The Pokemon Company, not OSM.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133380091

It's inappropriate to add advertising copy to OpenStreetMap.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133440938

I modified this to fit the building's footprint, which is generally the expectation for building=* objects.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133497293

If it still exists but doesn't go anywhere (which seems likely based on aerial photography), then mapping it and tagging aeroway=taxiway, access=no would be correct.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134089758

Please remember OSM is not an advertising platform, the description tag (along with all other tags) are inappropriate locations for ad copy.

Also please don't abbreviate street names or phone numbers.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160522996

I think in the web editor it's "D" (for detach).

What I meant was is the ALPR on the centerline of the cycleway and part of it? If not, it probably shouldn't be part of the cycleway.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160413722

You seem to have added lit=yes to hundreds of miles of road that very visibly don't have lights. Might I ask why?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160420127

Are you just hitting Yes to all the lit questions? Because there's a lot in this where lit=yes has been added to places which are definitely and obviously unlit, like unelectrified farm roads.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160420463

This one might need another shot at it since this appears to have been accidentally joined to the cycleway's centerline.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160407951

Didn't need the "access=yes" or "ford=yes" and part of 110th was named Brick Lane but I think I got it sorted.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135830422

Removing extraneous and fictional kink. See osm.wiki/Proposal:Placement#Examples for how placement=* ways are mapped.

changeset/160407094

Removing extraneous and fictional kink. See osm.wiki/Proposal:Placement#Examples for how placement=* ways are mapped.

changeset/160407094

Removing extraneous and fictional kink. See osm.wiki/Proposal:Placement#Examples for how placement=* ways are mapped.

changeset/160407094

Removing extraneous and fictional kink. See osm.wiki/Proposal:Placement#Examples for how placement=* ways are mapped.

changeset/160407094

Removing extraneous and fictional kink. See osm.wiki/Proposal:Placement#Examples for how placement=* ways are mapped.

changeset/160407094

Removing extraneous and fictional kink. See osm.wiki/Proposal:Placement#Examples for how placement=* ways are mapped.

changeset/160407094

Removing extraneous and fictional kink. See osm.wiki/Proposal:Placement#Examples for how placement=* ways are mapped.

changeset/160407094