Baloo Uriza's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 155631584 | Looks like you completely stomped on the destination and junction tagging in the process.
|
|
| 155692418 | Don't forget to remove "opening_date" when removing construction.
|
|
| 155799737 | Branch information is provided in the branch tag, not the name tag. Please get on board with standardization.
|
|
| 156022762 | The Q key can get you the right angles you're hunting for. Names should only be the names, if they're unnamed, don't add a name tag, just leave the name blank. Unit 125 seems to have extra digits. Be sure to fill out the rest of the address on each one. I might suggest building=static_caravan (britishism for "mobile home") as being more specific than the generic "residential".
|
|
| 156151002 | "Old US 77" is not a name, should be old_ref=US 77, noname=yes.
|
|
| 156151002 | "Old US 77" is not a name, should be old_ref=US 77, noname=yes.
|
|
| 5239083 | Might have overclassified some of those a notch and don't see a problem with those being listed as unclassified. County roads tend to be tertiaries generally but Osage County is a strange duck. |
|
| 155564613 | type=site isn't used anymore, and never was for city limits. The city limits should be type=boundary, boundary=administrative.
|
|
| 155567643 | Please, no abbreviations in address tags. Use "East" and "Highway", not "E" and "Hwy." Computers are good about creating abbreviations when necessary but bad about expanding them.
|
|
| 155505241 | Just "Sheraton" is more appropriate.
|
|
| 154005075 | Large landuses comprixing many blocks are hard to maintain and not very precise. Please strongly consider keeping landuse polygons on single square blocks and congruent with the lot lines of contiguous landuse instead of entire districts.
|
|
| 154122802 | Splits at the western avenue ramps were also improperly extended past the end of the theoretical gore as well...
|
|
| 154122802 | Actually this happened both directions... new position of centerlines no longer matches with the tags... a lot of work was put into making sure the placement tags indicated where in the road way the centerline lands on the through lanes. This is a good changeset to revert.
|
|
| 154122802 | Did you intend to move the westbound lanes to the right of lane 2 when the placement tag says middle of 2?
|
|
| 154147058 | Was that really necessary when the information you added more properly belongs in the branch tag?
|
|
| 154266881 | Was adding the branch really necessary in the name, especially when there's no branch tag?
|
|
| 155028421 | Adjusted a couple tags to match up with typical tagging specs. Welcome to OSM.
|
|
| 154715195 | The name should only be the name and not include descriptive elements like "private drive"
|
|
| 154320654 | Did this building get chopped in three? I'm not entirely clear why the remap?
|
|
| 154323726 | Looks like the parking is only at the east end of the church, not surrounding it.
|