Strange, user 'grabbitcompk' does not exist.

Reverted changeset to remove factitious hamlet from middle of Short Street, and replace the deleted traffic hump.

Hi, I've reverted this changeset. It looks like you've inadvertently removed lots of road names.

Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I have replaced the road name you removed as it is the name used on other maps compatible with OSM (OS Streetview), and its the street name used by properties adjacent to the road. It looks like the name removal was a mistake unless you can show otherwise.

Hi and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
Are you sure the house number is 1?
I have drawn and addressed the property in where your POI is located. If this is where the shop is the two can be consolidated, please confirm?

Hi and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
It looks like you inadvertently made addition to the live OSM map/database. This added nothing but unfortunately did dragged two other highways out of alignment. I have reverted these changes so the map/database is now back as it was.
May I remind that the map is live and open to everyone to make additions. But one has to be very careful not to make mistakes. If I can help in any way please ask. Regards

Hi, I've added the POI to the building to avoid duplication of info. Plus added a few details and corrected the building shape.

Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap.
It looks like you've placed Domino's on a car park. Features on OSM must be verifiable on the ground. Could you be more precise in positioning this POI, you could also include other details like address, website and phone. Regards

Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Features added to the OSM database must be verifiable on the ground. I don't think "pelvic" meets this requirement and therefore should be amended or removed. This site looks like a domestic dwelling so could not be described as leisure=common.
I await your response.

Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I see your first addition to the OSM database. The node looks as if it is in a field behind a residential area. May I remind that features on OSM must be verifiable on the ground. Although there may be some merit in the added feature in this position and tagged such it looks fictitious.
Please make corrections, state the accuracy of the feature, or remove it if it is a fiction. I can help with this if you wish.
Regards

Hello There, The updated building looks like it has several addresses but the single address you have added is to the whole block. As such the data is incorrect and should not be added to OSM in this manner. Much better to terrace the building then add addresses to the individual dwellings. Regards

Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
Can your new POI be actually determined at the place you have put it? Features must be verifiable on the ground in order to be acceptable to OSM. If you can affirm this then it would be good to put full details and the address in on the OSM database.
As at the moment the information provided is of little or no use to any OSM user.

Lots of duplicated fences around here, dividing fences between two properties I would think only use one fence not two on top of each other.

Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Your added POI is already mapped with lots of information, it is therefore a duplication and actually adds no benefit to OSM. So I have reverted it.
There is still much to map in London so please don't give up, just check a bit closer.

Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap.
The address for the cathedral on the official website is :-
The Chapter House,
St Paul's Churchyard,
London,
EC4M 8AD
Not St Paul's Church Yard.
The opening times (again from the official website) vary from day to day throughout any given month. Sight seeing times are usually 08:30 to 16:00 closing at 15:00 on Fridays, sight seeing times are not stated for Sundays. .
So your updating needs to be updated.

No response after comment and email so reverted changeset to remove duplicate ways

Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
Unfortunately your addition to the map results in several ways now being duplicated. Is there really a highway named Primrose Hill SRA that describes a large circle crossing the river twice? This new (I think fictitious), highway disrupts routeing software. Would you therefore please remove/revert these changes. If you wish I could do this for you. Regards

Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.
From looking at properties at 50 New Road (several apartments with address as Cookes Lodge, New Road, Burnham-on-Crouch, Essex), I am led to believe that the name Cookes Lodge should be applied to the apartment building number 50 New Road. The service road may well belong to the property but is it's name really Cookes Lodge and can this be verified on the ground? If not then it should be removed.

Hi, my main concern here was that a new highway (that footpath) was placed atop an existing one which was wrongly tagged as highway=service. I corrected this.

I do notice that relatively new mapper joejwall has added numerous way names in this manner, also naming paths and tracks as name=Path and name=Track. Then it seems sometimes not properly joining ways where they meet.
I am not local so don't have enough first hand info to make corrections. Perhaps if you are local you could tidy up the area.

Regards

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
Are you sure you have positioned the Rose & Crown hostel correctly? There is a Rose & Crown pub with hostel above mapped at 65 Union Street, just south of the railway from your POI. If you need any help just ask.