Hi, and Welcome to OpenStreetMap. I've adjusted the tags to suit OSM best practice, that is website, phone, post code and opening hours as per your website. Hope that's OK.

No response so problems have now been corrected.

Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I have removed the Big Ben POI as it is already mapped (POI is in the center of the building), so your mapping is duplication.

The shop=beauty you've placed in the middle of the street, if you want the map to point folk to the shop then it's best to more precisely place it preferably on the shop building.

Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
As it is the information is of little use to the database or anyone else. Would it be possible to give more company details, address ect. Maybe draw in the portion of the huge warehouse where the company is situated, even just add the entrance and put your POI on it.

I used the name that I would use today to describe the path, it is FP 1 in the parish of Fritton and St Olaves. That path is now in Norfolk in the parish of Fritton and St Olaves. The parish of Herringfleet does not now exist in Norfolk even in part, the part that was in Norfolk is now called Fritton and St Olaves CP. The part of the original parish of Herringfleet that is now in Suffolk is today called Somerleyton, Asby and Herringfleet CP. The NCC interactive map states the path as "Name : Old Parish of Herringfleet FP1 Parish : FRITTON AND ST OLAVES".

The statement accompanying the definitive map has no legal status anyway so would not be changed by NCC. It is only the legal document (the Definitive Map) that NCC would change and then only in what is termed as a legal event (the legal event is sometimes enacted years after the physical event).

A compromise could be to name the way whatever you choose and place a note in the database (on the way) to describe the anomaly, in case anyone else like me sees the discrepancy.

Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.

The security company you added to the OSM database is just that, retail business or office premises. It is therefore incorrect/misleading to tag it as 'amenity=police'.

Less importantly the accepted way to add telephone numbers is the international standard, in this case it would be +44 1603 783958

Hi, On some of the designated Quietways you have actually duplicated existing highways. I have rectified the couple I've noticed as duplication's, removing your duplication and then adding the relevant section of original way to the Quietway relation.
The way to add to the relation is to divide the section of the existing way, making a section of the existing way that can be added to the relation.

Hi and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I see you have deleted the cycle way and presume there was some mistake with that.
You also inadvertently moved the church POI, I have reverted that change so the church is now back where it was originally mapped.

No response so changeset reverted.

No trouble, if I can help/advise please just ask. One tip, buildings/houses usually have square corners, you can easily square up a whole building so it looks neater in iD by selecting then square corners.
If you're going to be doing a lot of mapping then the JOSM editor is far superior to iD.
Regards

Hi, is the house number correct?

Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap.
Unfortunately you have inadvertently made the corner building into a large circular shape. Also dragging out of shape the building lines within it and the building lines to either side.

It might be best to revert the whole changeset and start again, unless you can remember exactly how things were before your additions. If you don't feel confident I could do the revert for you. Please don't make further additions or alterations until the circle problem is sorted out, it'll only make things more difficult to correct.
Regards.

Sorry but the footway through the woods (Kirkwood NR) at the south west end looks like it starts from the railway line.

Hi, on this one the cycleway should have been split and the bridge tag added to the relevant section of way. Otherwise it would be a duplicated way, I've now done this.

Hi, what happens where the cycleway crosses the canal?

Hi, what junction is there where the cycleway twice crosses the footway?

Hi, what happens where the cycleway crosses the canal. Is there a bridge there? If so it would greatly help if it was mapped, (routing would then work).

Hi, I could not see anything to suggest a fiction. The building name and street exist, it's actually a small block of flats, the research center is not to far away. So give the benefit of any doubt?

Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
Sorry but I think you are mistaken by thinking the bus-stop name is incorrect and needs changing. That bus-stop name is actually Prairie Street. It is not named after the street it is on but from the bus company designation (Naptan Atco Code). Please inspect the actual sign at the bus stop.
In any case I very much doubt it would be named 'Home 121a QueenStown Road'.
I have reverted the changeset.

Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap, your changes have nearly all resulted in the misalignment of ways and buildings. Also the deletion of the name from a section of Charing Cross Road. As the inadvertent changes are intertwined it would be best to revert all of the changeset thus being sure to correct all misalignment's. If you wish I can revert the changeset for you? Regards.
Email also sent and I await a reply.