Hi, More untagged ways, can they be removed or will you rag them. If they stay they would be better if squared up.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I've moved your node to the position indicated on your website, on Maderia Road.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Thanks for drawing my attention here. Yes a mistake on my part in placing part of the tag value in the key. It's a Public Right of Way so the tags are designated=public_footpath
prow_ref=Hartwith cum Winsley BR 15.55/72/1
I've corrected it.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, the definitive map reference for a highway is not the name.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I reverted this changeset because it dragged features out of shape, re the warnings above.

Regards Bernard.

No response and not enough info to properly position it so removed.

Hi, I've removed Way: 1354046852, as it duplicates the existing highway, I've amended the existing highways.

Please check for problems like this before uploading as they would disrupt routing.

Regards Bernard.

Ford tag removed from footpath.

Hi, I've removed Way: 1354039317 as it duplicates an existing highway.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, I've removed these two highways,
Way: White House Lane (1354202722) and Way: White House Lane (1354202723) because they duplicate existing highways. If a feature needs amending it's OSM best practice to amend/correct any existing feature, not just map it again, thus the feature history is maintained. I've made amendments to the existing highways.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMao.

I've removed this highway because it duplicates an existing highway. If a feature needs amending it's OSM best practice to amend/correct anty existing feature, not just map it again, thus the feature history is maintained.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, The apartment is located in the highway area. Could you tag the address and place it in the appropriate building?

Regards Bernard.

Tagged details to the campsite outline

Hi, I've reinstated the unclasssified status of these highways as per OSM practice.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Please could you more precisely position the defibrillator so folk can easily find it? At the moment it's inside the building but your tag in inside=no, a bit confusing.

If you explain it's position maybe I could help?

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Several problems here with duplication of highways which could cause disruption of routing. I've removed parts of ways: 1353142317, 1353142317, 1353124796, 1353124779, 1353142314, 1353124778 and 1353124784. Also removed ways 1353142318, 1353142319, 1353124780 and 1353124781

Please don't place footways on top of other highways. The existing highway should be amended to any new data thus maintaining history.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, that's a building, not a garden, it may have a garden around it though. I've made an amendment,

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

The area can be tagged as both leisure=nature_reserve and natural=wood. I've amended the tags and added a website tag.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I've reverted your deletion of this track because it is a verifiable, ground-truth feature. It has been on the OSM database since 2014. I do not believe that OSM has ever tagged it incorrectly as a cycle path or footpath. It is tagged as private.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, I am assuming you are using the OSM front page map to test the routing:- osm.org/directions#map=16/52.15574/0.56439&layers=N. Please first refresh/reload that webpage in your browser. Now paste in the postcodes. For me the three car routing options work as expected going via Malting End. I must admit there is one problem, when reversed the GrapHopper option is incorrect. This points to the GrapHopper either not using up-to-date data or not using the OSM data correctly.

I've now added locked=yes to the gate.

You should now find the same routing as I do. But bear in mind that the delivery problem might still be that Amazon uses the OSM map data incorrectly, disregarding access restrictions in the map data..

Regards Bernard.