BCNorwich's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 162585949 | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. This footpath is a Public Right of Way and is currently open for use. There is an overlapping zig-zag gap in the central barrier for foot use on the A14. The state of the path nor the user's expectation does not alter these facts. If you don't feel safe on any highway don't use it, report it to the Highway Authority. I've amended the tags. Regards Bernard. |
|
| 162582664 | Hi, The apartments would be parts of the main building tagged as building:part=apartment. They should also have a level=? tag, could you please add this or let me know, I'll add them I've made amendments. Regards Bernard. |
|
| 162529400 | Thanks, sorted.
|
|
| 162529400 | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. That building looks like two houses. Do you need help with it? If so what is the other number and is 39 the north or south house? Regards Bernard. |
|
| 162396766 | I've made many corrections to your mapping. These are not motorways. Please take time to learn how to map properly, there are many guides. When uploading take heed of any warnings, 28 are given above for these changes. Thank You. |
|
| 162394523 | Hi, Thanks for trying to help but adding fiction does not help. With the 14 highway warnings given above you have disrupted routing here. Thus I've reverted your changes. Regards Bernard. |
|
| 162410221 | I've unjoined the wood area from the highways. |
|
| 161925701 | Problem features removed. |
|
| 161922815 | No response so I've removed the untagged ways and nodes. |
|
| 162243428 | Hi, You duplicated areas of solar panels that were already mapped by the fields. I've removed the duplication. Regards Bernard. |
|
| 162219117 | Fiction name removed, |
|
| 162145951 | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Several of these highways duplicated existing highways. I've removed the duplicate because they would disrupt routing. Regards Bernard. |
|
| 162121100 | Hi, part of the footpath Way: 1356645945 duplicated an existing highway so I've removed that section of footpath. Regards Bernard. |
|
| 159872995 | Hi, Just to let you know OSM best practice for Public Rights of Way that have names. Only formal and verifiable names are meant to go in the name tag. The PRoW reference is a reference used by the Highway Authority, it's not a name and should not be added to the name tag. It should go in the prow:ref tag. Thus River Lane should be tagged name=River Lane, prow:ref=Leatherhead BY 145. I've made an amendment here. Regards Bernard. |
|
| 162032905 | Hi, There's no such agency on the side of the road just here. The website also suggests no office here. Thus I assume this is fiction and remove the node. If it's somewhere else I may be able to help, just ask here, Regards Bernard. |
|
| 161977811 | Hi. I've tweaked your tagging and removed the relation, it's not needed. Regards Bernard. |
|
| 161973043 | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. The OSM database is to record data about on-the-ground verifiable features. It looks like this place, 10 Green Lane is an NHS surgery. The Travel Franchise website does not list this property as it's office. Thus I've removed your test listing node. By all means map genuine Travel Franchise offices. Regards Bernard. |
|
| 161967320 | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. The so called track is actually a highway=service, service=driveway, with access+private. I've amended to suit. Regards Bernard. |
|
| 161925701 | Hi, Indoor mapping is extremely complex and your additions don't meet OSM best practice. I think you ought remove these indoor features and perhaps learn the intracies of it first, a search for 'OSM indoor mapping help' would help you. Regards Bernard. You are still duplicating features and now using illogical tags (access=yes, amenity=bench, door=yes, indoor=room on a single feature). |
|
| 161922694 | Duplicated building Way: Business Design Centre (1355303925) removed. |