Hi, A lot of the buildings are out of square, partly joined, or very roughly drawn.
Some fields, and woods have gaps between them that are not ground truth. A hedge or ditch would be the boundary between fields with no gaps between the fields.

I started making corrections but this changeset is too large to easily manage. It's recommended to save little and often. There is no need for huge changesets.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, please don't join the farmland areas to the highway centerline. The farmer doesn't grow crops on the road or on verges.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, If this is an unclassified highway then how can it be a toll road? Where are the tolls collected and by whom?

Are you sure you've tagged the correct speed limit, when was it reduced to 30?

Where is the maxspeed:advisory=20 posted on this highway, because all OSM data must be verifiable?

I'm pretty sure the max-width is much more than 2.5m (8.25 feet).

The tag passing=difficult is subjective depending on the vehicle and at the passing places it's very easy.

Regards Bernard

Hi, I've restored the building's shape.
Regards Bernard.

Hi stick2, Unfortunately, lots of roads were removed. I've now reinstated the roads and amended the tags to their previous state.

Regards Bernard.

OK, that's all the deleted highways reinstated and I think all the tags are reverted to the state before your first amendments. So no harm done.

Regards Bernard.

OK, that's all the deleted highways reinstated and I think all the tags are reverted to the state before your first amendments. So no harm done.

Regards Bernard.

Hi,
Urgent!!!!!!!!

Now you're deleting the whole highway. Maybe several highways.
Please don't delete any more features, I'll try now to reinstate the deleted roads.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, is there really a 6-kilometer long ford? Could you please check and amend if necessary?

Hi, You continue to make duplicated sections of these paths. This is incorrect mapping. Please take the time to map the paths without doubling up on sections.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Much of your tagging is unnecessary as the highway status implies it. Some of the tags are subjective therefore incorrect for everyone. Also is Flaunden Lane really all oneway?

Regards Bernard.

Hi, OSM is not the place for fiction. It can be accommodated on the OSMFiction site. Could you please remove all these fictious features? Thanks.

Hello, I wonder if the path Way: 1192938783 is really separated from the old railway Way: Skipton & Colne (1085183330)? Or as is often the case the path is actually on the line of the old railway,(one actual feature)? There is a further problem with the track Way: 1085183332 joined to the bridge your path and the railway, it doesn't look right.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, I've removed the duplicated sections of the highways you somehow added.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, I've removed the duplicated sections of the highways you somehow added.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, I've removed the duplicated sections of the highways you somehow added.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, I've removed the duplicated sections of the highways you somehow added.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, I've removed the duplicated sections of the highways you somehow added.

Regards Bernard.

I've fixed quite a few of the duplicated highway sections.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

There were three house numbers 128, I've made an amendment.

Regards Bernard.