All fixed now and a route relation made.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

How do folk get into the car park? Please.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Test data removed, please see previous comment.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
OSM is a live worldwide database from which, among other uses, maps are compiled. Adding fiction, personal or test data can corrupt the database and is therefore not allowed. There are other sites for such data, or it can be saved offline without uploading it.

The park is already mapped.

Thus I've reverted your changes.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, I see you may have mapped a duplicate highway. It's the north section of a footpath Way: 1191471365, on top of this path, and joined to it, is a tunnel, Way: 1191471367 Are there two highways on atop the other?

Sorry to have bothered you if there really are two paths, but if so how does someone get into the tunnel?

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Thanks for your contribution in amending land areas. Are the two now uncultivated areas you've tagged as leisure=park now accessible to the public as part of Melford Park? If so they ought to be incorporated into the existing park area, Way: Melford Park (122184235). It would be most helpful to know the surface cover of the areas.

Regards Bernard.

Also is the

Hi, There's a lot more loops of track in Way: 1190168916 than you've drawn. also the track should be segmented so that correct layer tags can be added. As drawn the track self-intersects, I've segmented it, please check/amend the layer tag.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome.

Just one point, squaring up buildings makes them look neater. Highlight/select the building, right click then click the square icon. All corners are squared up.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, You've placed most of Way: Ducks Unlimited Park Loop (1189459830) on top of existing highways. This makes duplicated highway lines that can disrupt routing. In cases like this the existing highway should be amended to hold all the highway information.

Regards Bernard.

No response so I've removed all the bridges, amended some names to descriptions.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

This would be amenity=dentist not a hospital.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Probably a lot of mistakes here, I see lots of roads tagged as bridges which do not look right. Also I see you've added road names to nodes, the names should only be tagged onto the actual road lines.

So could you please check and remove any mistaken bridge and layer tags, and remove names from nodes (putting the names on the roads)?

Need any help please just ask.

Regards Bernard.

I've removed duplicated sections of highways.

No response so I've remedied the self-intersections. Now contemplating removal of the duplicated walls.

Hello, theres no need to promote your business in this way, it has already been removed as will the advert on your profile. Why don't you just map the business into OSM? Need any help please just ask.

Regards Bernard.

@SomeoneElse,
I was prompted to look it up. Seems to be Arch Location in latin. There are arches on the first node that I removed. I've removed the second node now as there is an archway/building passageway adjacent, no arch in the road.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Can you please respond and/or fix these problems?

Thanks

Hi, Please see here:- https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=0.33394&lat=50.81932&zoom=18&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

You've inadvertently introduced self-intersecting outlines. Also, there are now two walls, your new wall outline, and the existing wall=castle_wall. Could you resolve these problems, please?

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Please be aware that you are creating duplicate sections of highways, this disrupts routing. I've just found and removed 10 such highways. It would be better if you made smaller changesets, this one has 50 features edited, 10 would be better. Then you or others can more easily check for mistakes.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Sorry, I apologize for the above comment, I thought there were more problems but they are the ones I mentioned previously.
The duplicates are all remedied up to date.

Regards Bernard.