Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Your new highway Carella Way was joined to the power line. I've unjoined it so folk won't be shocked!

Regards Bernard.

Childish fiction removed.

Fiction removed from name.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Unfortunately, you made quite a few mistakes here, as indicated by the warnings given above. The unjoined crossing highways and many duplicated sections of highways are particularly problematic as they would disrupt routing.

I think I've fixed all the highway problems, but several more minor problems likely remain.

Please take care when mapping or correcting highways. Please don't duplicate any highways or sections of highways. Please don't cross a highway over another without joining them.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Address tags corrected.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Unfortunately you new highway are all duplicating existing highways which could disrupt routing. Thus I've reverted the changeset, all is now OK.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Your new path line duplicated the existing path line and it doubled back on itself.

The path does exist but it was wrongly positioned. I've removed your duplicated line and corrected the existing path to it's correct position a little further north.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Google Earth is copyrighted so we must not use it's images to map to OSM. The road is on the imagery available to OSM so I've mapped the road to the line on Bing imagery.

Regards Bernard.

Hi Jan,
I've now looked at the whole junction layout and there are anomalies, I'll try to explain the logic I assume.

The 4 sections of ref N44, (Way: Leidsestraatweg (7471615), Way: Rijksstraatweg (1216487071), Way: Leidsestraatweg (59002595) and Way: Rijksstraatweg (7471605), are the bottom layer, I've changed from layer=-1 to layer= 0, no tag as this is implied in the absence of the layer tag.

Way: 860437191, Way: 964339476, Way: 964339481, Way: Zijdeweg (860477018), Way: Zijdeweg (860437189), Way: 964339486 and Way: Zijdeweg (860437193) are all correctly tagged as layer=1 (above the N44 way sections mentioned above).

The bridge sections, Way: 328255383, Way: Landscheidingsweg (127838915) and Way: Landscheidingsweg (127838916), are above everything mentioned in the two paragraphs above. I've changed these ways from layer=1 to layer=2.

Could you please review the changes? In case I've made a mistake the changeset is here:- changeset/173744079

Regards Bernard.

No response so I've removed the tags.

No geometry was broken, and there was a reason for the changes, perhaps you hadn't noticed.

The changeset actually removed sections of duplicated highway. I see you made a revert then made several other changes to the area. I'm glad to see that it ended up almost exactly as I left it, no duplication thanks.

Regards Bernard.

Hi,
My understanding is that a feature directly under another feature (in this case a bridges tagged layer=1) should be one layer less than layer=1, which is layer=0, which in it's absence, is implied as layer=0.

Way: Utrechtsebaan (7474878) is directly under twelve features, bridges tagged as layer=1. Thus, I assume that with no layer tag at all, layer=0 is implied. Way:Utrechtsebaan (7474878) is not tagged as a tunnel.

My apologies if I'm wrong but I can't see why.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I've reinstated the Public Right of Way as it is still a highway no matter its state of repair. There looks like there is a gap in the central crash barrier to allow for crossing.

What you could do is contact Suffolk County Council and complain about the state of repair of the highway.

Levington Heath, both sides of the A14, is Open Access Land, so you are allowed open access on foot to the whole area; it's on the Ordnance Survey map.

Regards Bernard.

I've removed several duplicated highway sections, re-warnings above

Hi, Some of the warnings above need to be corrected.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

There are several warnings given above regarding this changeset. You dragged some highways out of alignment, which I've corrected. they were the 7 crossing_ways:highway-highway.

There also seem to be some problems with the building you've added or altered, which I don't have the knowledge to correct. Perhaps you could review them.

Regards Bernard.

No response, so I've reinstated the woods that appear on imagery.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Can you explain what your intention is with this tagging to an existing highway node, please? As such, it doesn't make any sense.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap..

The AED is positioned within the garage outline. Which looks like it's not accessible to the public, as access+yes implies? Can you please correct your map position and tags to something logical? If not then the POI ought to be removed.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

The pub is already mapped as Way: Sussex Arms (311904776) and Relation: The Sussex Arms (8757463). Thus I've added your data to the building outline.

Regards Bernard.