Please, don't change building=house to less specific building=yes

Please, don't delete addr:postcode and building:levels tags!

Don't break the geometry of buildings. I reverted this changeset. Please, contact me and I will explain what you are doing wrong.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147149811

Don't break the geometry of buildings. I reverted this changeset. Please, contact me and I will explain what you are doing wrong.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147151178

Don't break the geometry of buildings. I reverted this changeset. Please, contact me and I will explain what you are doing wrong.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147164599

Don't break the geometry of buildings. I reverted this changeset. Please, contact me and I will explain what you are doing wrong.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147164900

Don't break the geometry of buildings. I reverted this changeset. Please, contact me and I will explain what you are doing wrong.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147165839

Thank you for paying attention. I changed RGZ name because of existent name of the street. Now I changed all the names to "Душко Трифуновић": changeset/145363921

Hi there! Your proposal would make the bridge invisible for routers and, consiquently, for hikers who don't think the bridge is so dangerous.
I believe description tag is enough. Out local community suggests to add condition=dilapidated or condition=poor. There isn't perfect decision, so in my opinion, it's better to guide people to the bridge and give them an opportunity to decide by themselves.
And I know that local hikers are going to fix this bridge soon )

Please, be more careful with a shape of buildings. In most cases buildings are square or rectangle, so angles are 90 degrees. You can square the corners by pressing Q in iD editor.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142426718

Hi, vojtechzaboril! I disagree about access=no. As wiki says, 'Access values describe legal permissions/restrictions and should follow ground truth'. There're no restriction signs at both sides of the bridge.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141564592

Reverted

changeset/141320257

Reverted

changeset/141320257

Reverted

changeset/141320257

Reverted

changeset/141320257

You've drew nonexistent buildings and broke geometry of existing ones. Please, don't do that.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141307371

Hi, Tammo. You've drew nonexistent buildings and broke geometry of existing ones. Please, don't do that.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141307434

Hi, Matchavariani. Why did you broke geometry of existing buildings? Please, don't do that.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141310813

Hi, Diixiing. You've drew nonexistent buildings and broke geometry of existing ones. Please, don't do that.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141316285

Reverted changeset/141303494