OpenStreetMap
Anton Khorev's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 97639007 | Кто что поудалял и где что надо (было) восстановить? |
|
| 97634304 | В чём был смысл этой операции? Обсуждалась ли она с сообществом? Что такое "свои данные"? Это, например, "ваша" река: way/42487400/history ? |
|
| 96991518 | Your latest way additions still have OBJECTID and Shape_Leng tags. Interestingly, they have the same values (OBJECTID=3391). If you are copy-pasting tags on newly created ways, you need only these two: highway=track and surface=unpaved . |
|
| 93294165 | возьмём, например, эту точку:
Что такое operator=Торговый дом Северо-западный ? Я почему-то другого оператора вижу: https://yadi.sk/i/D8cOFJV2h5naOA Чем лучше ссылка https://www.220-volt.ru/ по сравнению с https://www.220-volt.ru/shop-369/1/ для отдельного магазина? |
|
| 96611538 | Hello Marta_Lushch.
(автоматичний переклад)
|
|
| 96752910 | Please note that the inscription tag you altered is not for "the truth" but for what's actually written on the monument:
Photo of the monument:
|
|
| 96938863 | Hello. Recently you along with other users were editing this road:
In a few days you made over two thousand edits, however each of these edits didn't change the road much:
Can you explain the purpose of these edits? Best regards
|
|
| 96867100 | Hello. Recently you along with other users were editing this road:
In a few days you made over two thousand edits, however each of these edits didn't change the road much:
Can you explain the purpose of these edits? Best regards
|
|
| 96922632 | Hello. Recently you along with other users were editing this road:
In a few days you made over two thousand edits, however each of these edits didn't change the road much:
Can you explain the purpose of these edits? Best regards
|
|
| 96827403 | Hello. Recently you along with other users were editing this road:
In a few days you made over two thousand edits, however each of these edits didn't change the road much:
Can you explain the purpose of these edits? Best regards
|
|
| 96861934 | Hello. Recently you along with other users were editing this road:
In a few days you made over two thousand edits, however each of these edits didn't change the road much:
Can you explain the purpose of these edits? Best regards
|
|
| 96820499 | Hello. Recently you along with other users were editing this road:
In a few days you made over two thousand edits, however each of these edits didn't change the road much:
Can you explain the purpose of these edits? Best regards
|
|
| 96856061 | Hello. Recently you along with other users were editing this road:
In a few days you made over two thousand edits, however each of these edits didn't change the road much:
Can you explain the purpose of these edits? Best regards
|
|
| 96966376 | Hello. Recently you along with other users were editing this road: way/885527284 In a few days you made over two thousand edits, however each of these edits didn't change the road much: https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/885527284 Can you explain the purpose of these edits? Best regards
|
|
| 96991518 | Hello. I see you're now using highway=track tag, so hopefully it doesn't raise any routing issues. Also the tracks in this changeset are connected and don't have any unnecessary tags. However in the last couple of days you still uploaded ways with nonstandard tags like "InLine_FID" and "MaxSimpTol":
The ways added in these changesets were later updated with proper tags, but it would be preferable to clean up their tags before uploading to OSM. |
|
| 96556278 | "The landfill is exactly here because official plan says so" is not the strongest argument you can make because we map what's on the ground
Your opponents may say that this place is obviously not a landfill because they see a parking here and that the actual landfill is to the south of it
Let's suppose you want to map landuses like they are on the official plan. You map the area "006 - 53" as landuse=landfill. But there are other areas like "... - 41" that don't directly correspond to current landuse polygons. Should they be changed too? You say that dividing the landfill is improper, but that's not the argument your opponents make. They say that the actual landfill covers smaller area (see this changeset comment changeset/93858538 ) I mentioned splitting the area because they don't tag "not a landfill". Tagging it as landuse=industrial is another option. You can find examples of waste disposal facilities mapped in various ways: as one landuse=landfill
as landuse=landfill for actual landfill with landuse=industrial for warehouses, sorting facilities and so on
as landuse=landfill inside landuse=industrial
The name(s) of the area(s) is a separate argument. |
|
| 96626838 | Hello. You together with Szymson are changing back and forth the landfill area and its name. Let's look at the name first. Do you think that "Zakład Utylizacyjny" is a good name? Do you think that setting this name is "reverting vandalism"? (automatyczne tłumaczenie) Dzień dobry. Razem z Szymsonem zmieniacie teren składowiska i jego nazwę. Spójrzmy najpierw na nazwę. Czy uważasz, że „Zakład Utylizacyjny” to dobra nazwa? Czy myślisz, że nadanie tej nazwy "wycofuję wandalizm"? Anton Khorev
|
|
| 96556278 | Hello. Have you considered splitting the polygon way/160892985 into two landuses: one for landfill and the other for warehouses and everything else? (as opposed to having just one smaller landuse inside like in this changeset:
|
|
| 96396684 | You're still mapping tracks as highway=unclassified because you think that tracks are not supported by routing software. However, you still don't always connect your highways with each other. Ways are going to be connected if they have common nodes, but you often leave nodes of some ways near other ways instead of joining them. Here's an example of such node:
This is going to lead to routing problems like this:
Maybe you're not using highway=track for wrong reasons and your routing doesn't work because of unconnected ways? |
|
| 94717251 | If you don't know the correct alignment, you can try matching the imagery with the existing data. To do so while editing, go to Background Settings (one of the icons on the right side), scroll down to Imagery Offset, move the pointer inside the gray rectangle. When the pointer changes into four arrows, you can drag the background imagery. |
