No actually.

Just a small change affecting this junction:
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=69919520
https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/69919520/

Salam, biar betul ada papan tanda Jalan Masjid kat situ.

Papan tanda nama Jalan Kodiang kat lampu isyarat tengah pekan ada lah.

So... apparently it's the Setiawangsa Pantai Expressway. Using JOSM and am not a KL local, so I really don't have idea this is somewhere near Setiawangsa.

Hi @pitscheplatsch,

This user is participating in this mapping program: https://news.utm.my/2019/03/grab-geostar-program-2019-for-the-enthusiastic-geoinformatics-students-to-become-mentors-for-community-mappers/

*I would

We don't have district boundaries for Perak yet, but I'll treat Muallim as a full fledged district.

Same as Pokok Sena in Kedah. It's a "subdistrict" too. But it has its own Pejabat Tanah and the likes.

Two district ("county") boundary relations was found incomplete as they were, and will be rectified in future import uploads.

Mukim boundaries... why not? Penang is the first state to 'open' it, compared to the rest of the country.

PEGIS people might look forward to actually share geodata, but, yeah. We need contacts first.

Awwww shucks, PEGIS has updated their page. Now I cannot see contact details anymore.

Should have passed this information to you wayyyy earlier.

Hello.

Any chance you can provide the source of reference to make edits to this particular boundary?

I have no idea (Queensbay and adjacent areas). You may adjust the boundaries accordingly to your local knowledge.

Most state boundaries in our country follows natural features (rivers and peaks usually). Rivers can change course with time.

There may be an exact definition for that, and Sinar Project's copy is definitely based on an older data. So it probably explains why it looks very windy.

I guess more research is needed but again, you need a better, open and free source for that. But you could spend some time to edit so that it matched the common knowledge.

Hopefully issues are rectified following these changesets:

changeset/67967636
changeset/67967665
changeset/67967782

Okay, post-import reflection: 100+ conflicts this time. Apparently someone has tied a boundary node to waterways quite recently, although a cleanup process was done earlier.

My first import: please let me know if there are errors so that it could be rectified as soon as possible.

Hello, welcome to OpenStreetMap!

There's no need to include height information for peaks - the name field is for names of features only.

osm.wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only

Don't need to tag highway exits. Because exit means you're going out from the expressways to enter another road.

You would eventually come back into the expressways from any R&Rs.

Many thanks for your response and actions.

I'm not going to be a gatekeeper in my home state - Kedah, except the Langkawi Island (relation/4444908); but I've been contributing through ground truth. Seeing things with my surveys.

I salute your team's work on adding unmapped roads through remote mapping. Not everybody has the time doing that, including myself.

Hopefully your team might take extra precautions - not overwriting someone else's effort in order to put more things on the map.

Since your team is editing with JOSM, take some time to inspect history of road geometries (Ctrl + H). If it's quite recently mapped (e.g. probably up to 2 years ago by an active local mapper), just try contacting those related users to get an idea why and to inform that changes would be made (and state the reason why).

Hello there.

This particular way: way/482514619/history

I have surveyed there by myself last year. See history. It's actually closer to an unclassified road, rather than a residential road.

Hello! I don't think this particular stretch of this highway (way/236001234) has a speed limit of 30 km/h.