This changeset broke the boundary between Slovenia and Croatia again. Please inform yourself about the OpenStreetMap data model before you edit further boundaries. [1]

The iD Editor is no appropriate editor for editing boundaries as it hasn't an validator.

[1] type=multipolygon
osm.wiki/Relation:boundary

I had to revert this changeset as it damaged the boundaries between Slovenia and Croatia in a technical way (the Multipolygon wasn't closed). As you've damaged the Polygons of Slovenia, Croatia and Hungary several times in the last few months (technically), I've reported the shifted boundaries to the mailingslists of the local communities of the affected countries. https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-hr/2014-December/thread.html
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/openstreetmap-hungary
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-si

This is the 12 nautical miles boundary of Vietnam. I've restored the boundary.

I've corrected the tagging (removed highway=pedestrian and added man_made=geoglyph). Mapbox Satellite imagery shows that the memorial is a bit bigger and that 50% of the memorial are already covered with sand. Maybe in reality the memorial isn't visible anymore.

Da es schon mehrere Hinweise über beschädigte Grenzen gab, hier mal der Hinweis auf folgende Threads: http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=28979
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=472091#p472091

Schottegat and all the other bays are natural=bay and not natural=water. The bays lie at the coast so the coastline has to include the bays. See the definition of natural=coastline: natural=coastline I've fixed the coastline already. The rendering process will take some days.

ref=FIXME is no valid ref-number in China. Please use the fixme-tag instead: osm.wiki/Fixme

I've tried to repair the boundary due to changeset/27413034
I hope that's right

boundary area overlaps here. does this area belong to Baltimore or Carroll County? osm.org/?mlat=39.59400&mlon=-76.83358#map=18/39.59400/-76.83358 furthermore the boundaries of Caroll County and Baltimore County got damaged due to this changeset.

I've reverted this changeset as it damaged some admin boundaries and deleted valuable landuses without any comment via changeset/27412919

In diesem Changeset wurde einige Wege in "Wa2" umbenannt. Vermutlich heißt aber nicht der Weg "Wa2" sondern ein Wanderweg der über den Weg führt.

Weitere Infos über die richtige Benennung: osm.wiki/DE:Names#name_ist_nur_der_Name
Erfassung von Wanderwegen: osm.wiki/DE:Relation:route#Wanderwege

Durch diesen Changeset wurde die Grenze des künftigen Nationalparks Hunsrück-Hochwald beschädigt: http://i.imgur.com/PgRRiSg.png

Ich repariere das gleich mal.

This changeset damaged some administrative boundaries. Please do not edit objects you're not familiar with.

Hi mogeogis, please use meaningful changeset comments and state out your sources.
Does the coastline represent the condition after the construction is finished?

download the following file which contains the polygon: http://www.filedropper.com/export1
Then you can upload the file into umap when you press the upload button on the right side: http://i.imgur.com/AaSE3iz.png

Also I think that my modus operandi was ok as I've notified you about the deletion: changeset/26898665

The polygon could be simply restored but this makes no sense when you don't tell us what this polygon represents.

Maybe you are searching for a service like Umap where you can visualize objects which are incompatible with OpenStreetMap? I've created an example for Kreyol Matanza: http://umap.openstreetmap.fr/de/map/kreyol-matanza_22614#12/19.3625/-70.6277
Or are you searching for a tool to coordinate the mapping effort? http://tasks.hotosm.org/

Please respect the OpenStreetMap guidelines for disputed boundaries: http://wiki.osmfoundation.org/w/images/d/d8/DisputedTerritoriesInformation.pdf
Otherwhise I have to inform the Data Working Group.

Bosnia and Herzegovina has no physical control over Sutorina. We do not map any claims.

I've reverted your changeset.

Thanks

I've deleted the polygon as it covered a large area without residential landuse. landuse=residential

On which sources are this changes based? LSIB 5 shows the old, deleted boundary as correct: http://i.imgur.com/h73jLsM.png