Or seasonal=*

Potential solutions to the issues you raise are
`access:conditional`, `intermittent`, `date_on/off`.

I plan to actually do a survey of this exact path on Tuesday.

Auto correction: unable = usable

Hi. You raise several interesting issues here.
1. Don't add GPX traces... Why not? Does that not prove that someone has used that path? Do you think that, if a path is unable only half a year, it should not be on the map? Should we remove all paths on Hochschwab because they are not unable when the snow falls?
2. "There are no paths... You can walk everywhere". This seems to be a contradiction. If a way is walkable, then it is a path. How else do you define a path? How do you calculate the distance or time across a walkable terrain, if there is no path? How do you mark passages that are safe to walk on, vs getting seriously injured or worse?

Will confirm next week when I do this tour.

I will confirm this next week, when I'm on the spot, following this path.

I have provided a reference that confirms that a path exist. What is your information based on?

I'm sorry but people have used this path, it is in their GPX. That is exactly what a path is - a walkable section.

Das genau ist die Definition von einem Weg, glaube ich.

No worries. Please feel free to delete the ones that are not possible to go through, or add an appropriate difficulty.
On one of the changesets I did actually request a review. Thank you so much for reviewing this. It will help people like me have more fun the next time!
I was there just now, over Easter, and it looks quite different than on aerial photos, that's for sure. :)
Also, you can cross check with BEV Inspire. Those photos are a bit different than Ortfoto.
But, since you know the area, please feel free to adjust as it is on the ground. Thanks again! I may get in touch with you when I'm back in the summer. ;)

I've just gone through this changeset and there are many paths that I've drawn based on the BEV airplane photos.

Hi! Yes, you are right. I was preparing for spending a few days there and exploring the area, trying to connect the existing paths. However, after being there on snow, it is more likely that these are not actually passable due to steep terrain.
I'd be happy to delete these changes if we can find a way to list them.

Moze li neko na terenu potvrditi da ove staze stvarno vise ne postoje?
Pjesacke staze na Trebevic su oznacene i odrzavane. Cudi me da ih vise nema.

You are most likely right. I may have mixed up the names. I thought I saw it at a board at the spot but don't have any fotos to double-check now.
I've removed the name, anyway, as it does not contribute anything to the viewpoint mark.
Thanks!

It's a full line all the way.
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?z=18.002058557365068&lat=48.2132680549&lng=16.37950601830005&pKey=201458618244224&focus=photo

I added a "no-u-turn" and now it seems ok.
https://i.imgur.com/76LS2Gv.png

What I'm concerned about is this: https://i.imgur.com/PROsfL1.png

Hi! Thanks a lot for the comments. OsmAnd does this when driving south from Praterstraße and wanting to get back to the same location. Going on Untere Donaustraße, a U-turn is suggested here, to turn south over the bridge (can't turn left from Untere DS here).

Hi, @michalfabik! Thanks for the feedback.

1) The local name is "Pjesacka staza br. 1" (without glyphs). However, there is also an English version next to it. See https://imgur.com/wrJ50Pu. I can adjust it, if that's the preferred option.

2) Yes, that's the common mark in BiH. Not sure if or how else I could better mark trails. This is my first time doing it and I've tried to do it the way they do it in Austria, which I find excellent.
In BiH there are no trail number markings or names, just the circle.