These routes are part of the National Rail network. In the same manner, should we update the network= tag for all other Train Operating Companies as well?

The steps shouldn't be deleted. It runs alongside the escalator.

Sorry maybe the renderer is wrong then. Graphhopper attempted to route my bike in the reverse direction on the main carriageway rather than the cycleway.

I have heard from somewhere that the definition of a transport network can be defined as a set of routes which accept a common ticket. In such circumstances National Rail is clearly a network, however, the same argument can also be used to argue that London Underground and DLR, and also the rail services in the zones are a network as well so I doubt if this argument stands.

From my understanding that routes belong to a transport network should have their information delivered in a uniform way from a single official source as the authority, for example, all London Bus routes irrespective of their operators belong to a single network. This is the same of all National Rail routes as well irrespective if it is operated by GTR under one of its four brands, or if it is operated by Arriva Rail London under the brand of London Overground.

London Overground should appear as brand="London Overground" instead, as it is what is shown at stations and on trains

London Overground is no different from any other TOCs in the country with the exception that the operator doesn't have revenue risk and TfL keeps the marketing / branding.

If we should tag all Thameslink / South Western Railway / Greater Anglia / etc. lines as network="National Rail" we should also do it on London Overground as well. They are all ATOC members, operate to NRCoT, can be searched in National Rail journey planners and accept National Rail tickets.

Urban / NT / Lantau taxis, scheduled / non-scheduled service minibuses or franchised / non-franchised buses are not vehicle properties. Vehicle properties refer to something physical like height, weight, width, axle weight, etc. The above are legal classifications instead.

In such case it should be hazmat=* instead of conditional restriction because it now becomes a property of the vehicle itself instead of the use of vehicle.

An NT taxi cannot be used as an urban taxi. That's it, unlike emergency=* (where it is only emergency when the flashing light and siren are on).

Please don't confuse driver licence with vehicle registration. All 3 kinds of taxis are registered as different types of vehicles on their vehicle registrations, although a single class 6 licence is enough to drive them all.

I have read the documentation before making the change. The difference between urban and NT taxis are not use of the mode. These taxis are legally different classes of vehicles.

In contrast, if there is a place where taxis without passengers can't enter but taxis with passengers can enter, it will be mapped with a conditional restriction as they are different uses of vehicle.

Only routing software which understand the difference between 3 kinds of taxis in Hong Kong can understand these tagging.

It is not =service because through traffic may use it (traffic from Tsing Yi North to Tuen Mun)

please don't mess up the bus routes again, the ordering of the ways in the bus routes are wrong in this changeset!

WTF did you add "addr:street:carriageway_ref:kmb" and "addr:street:ref:kmb" into the bus stops?! These are undocumented and it seems meaningless.

What the heck are you doing here? Why did you delete all the bus stops of A33?!

I don't think that it's correct to put highway_link=* on a road which is not a pure link. And there is no requirement that highway=trunk/primary/secondary/etc. must serve non motorway traffic. Moreover, it is also possible to have classification change in the middle of the driveway, like the southern end of route 1.

=motorway_link is also misleading here as "Shun Long Road is not a link".

Similar cases include Hung Tin Road, Tsing Tin Road, Po Shun Road, Long Tin Road, etc.

Shun Long Road is not a link. It is a distributor road. Therefore tagging it as *_link is inappropriate.

For Airport Road, it is neither a link nor a distributor road. It is an extension of the motorway itself.

I also have repeated that it's misleading to tag highway=motorway_link on long stretch of roads which are clearly not motorways. Shun Long Road is not a motorway and it is a separate highway to any of the motorways around the area. It is just a normal road which connects the HK port to Lantau Island.