❤️🔥's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 130429931 | thanks, I've changed `level` to `level:ref` to match the local numbering system |
|
| 95595326 | sure, I'm not sure if there is a convention in NZ, there seems to be a mix of both approaches. If service road is more fitting feel free to change it |
|
| 111314599 | Hey, I wasn't sure if this one is a duplicate, since Mount Erebus has a well known elevation of 3794 but this one is 3790... https://static.topo.linz.govt.nz/maps/antarctic/tiff-300-no-logo/ME14_TIFFv1-01.tif I think you're right though, this must be a duplicate. will fix |
|
| 130429931 | Hi, regarding your comments, entrance=emergency is a popular tag which the iD editor has a preset for. The name of this preset is "Emergency Exit" If you think this is illogical you'd be better off starting a discussion at https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema Also my understanding is that `layer=-2` + `level=2` is valid, for buildings with strangley numbered floors: Layer | Level
or am I mistaken? |
|
| 130335598 | Hi, there's already a suburb node for Heathcote Valley (node/7745894823). Now there are two duplicates... Maybe you should delete this node if "Heathcote" genuinely doesn't exist, or change it to another tag like place=locality if it's a recognised place, but not a suburb. A quick google search suggests that Heathcote might be an established name (e.g. https://nzhistory.govt.nz/keyword/heathcote), but I'm not sure, I'm not a local |
|
| 128662711 | thanks for updating it :) |
|
| 128662711 | Hi, you added access=no to this bridge, are you saying that the bridge is completely shut to everyone? |
|
| 112055678 | hey, yeah I agree landuse=meadow isn't the best tag. Nor is landuse=farmland. There was a brief discussion on the talk-nz mailing list a year ago: https://lists.osm.org/pipermail/talk-nz/2021/000309.html If you've got ideas for how to tag them better then let's change it. Maybe `type=boundary` + `boundary=something` ? |
|
| 129110314 | yeah, if `motor_vehicle=destination` isn't strictly correct feel free to remove it... I would hope that routers try to avoid shared spaces by default |
|
| 127038266 | oh yeah it's not important in this example. just thought i'd mention why seamark:type=hulk & seamark:hulk:category is useful. the osm wiki is rather confusing when it comes to seamarks :( |
|
| 127038266 | sure. the downside is without a seamark tag it's invisible on nautical maps like OpenSeaMap. which is probably not a big issue in London where very few seamaps are mapped mapping hulks with seamark tags is useful when it's overlayed with AIS data, which a good marine GPS unit would do. e.g. https://map.openseamap.org/?zoom=17&lat=-36.83445&lon=174.79524&layers=BFTFFFFFFTF0TFFFFFFFFF you can see the ferry(ies) berthed next to the 'hulk' |
|
| 127038266 | *nautical |
|
| 127038266 | if i recall correctly, the official naturical charts show it as a hulk (OBJL=HULKES) presumably with CATHLK=3 which according to seamark:hulk:category=* would translate to
so i guess the AHO are tagging-for-the-renderer if it's not strictly a hulk :) |
|
| 127038266 | oh sorry, I thought i saw a sign that said it was permanently moored there... |
|
| 126969764 | sorry, thanks for fixing this |
|
| 128797552 | hi again. I signed up to discord but couldn't figure out how to join the oceania group... anyway, here's a few of those junctions that I noticed. and i'm happy to change 'oneway' to 'railway:preferred_direction' as you mentioned in a different thread, if you think that's a good idea osm.org/#map=19/-33.94190/150.94304
|
|
| 128797552 | cool, I'll join the discord tonight. yeah the number of exceptions to that rule confused me a bit. stuff like this: osm.org/#map=19/-33.82962/151.21377 |
|
| 128588163 | yeah, a number of tracks already had oneway=yes so I just followed the (local) convention. Sorry if this is wrong. In europe they seem to use railway:preferred_direction instead, so I guess all the `oneway=yes` tags could be changed to `railway:preferred_direction=forward`... |
|
| 128797552 | Hi, sorry this is what I saw at many other interchanges around syndey (e.g. osm.org/#map=19/-33.91897/150.85298). will fix |
|
| 128752151 | the turn restriction looks good, nice work |