thanks for fixing this, interesting to know about the maproulette UI... i was just scrolling thru osmcha for NZ looking for one of my own edits :)

this area is within an existing parking lot, i think the proper fix is to delete it or split it into individual parking spaces?

this area is within an existing parking lot, i think the proper fix is to delete it or split it into individual parking spaces?

cool, no problem - the address import tool noticed this so I've deleted the duplicates

Hi, addresses should only go on the main building, they shouldn't be duplicated on sheds or garages

yep, fixed :)

Hi, i've fixed the direction. you can do this by right clicking the line and then clicking "Reverse". Or, select the line and click `v` on your keyboard

der amenity=post_box habe ich entfernt, es ist sehr unwahrscheinlich dass es ein briefkasten auf diesen neuseeländischer feldweg gibt

/

I've removed the amenity=post_box because it's quite unlikely that it exists there

sorry! i was going to return to survey the actual track layout but didn't get a a chance in the end... i see you've figured out the new route thru Clyde Station, thanks for fixing this

p.s. is it better to leave a gap in the route relations in situations like this? or leave the whole area alone and add an OSM note?

Hi, sorry most of this edit was based on a survey around the Lilyfield lightrail depot. I saw two large structures from the A4, which I assumed were the temporary roofs visible in bing aerial imagery. that was my mistake, i'll be more careful in the future...

Thanks for fixing this. As far as I know, there's no easy way to tell which imagery is the newest. Sometimes you can figure it out from the history of OSM features....

Hi, LINZ Aerial Imagery is 7 years out of date. You've deleted many things that have been built since 2017 in your last ~100 or so changesets. Bing Aerial imagery is better, it's about 9 months old in urban auckland.

awesome, thanks

Hi, ref:linz:topo50_id is currently used 86,000 times vs ref:linz:t50_fid is used 0 times - should we be consistent and pick one of the two? I think the former is slightly more descriptive

https://taginfo.osm.org/keys/ref:linz:topo50_id
https://taginfo.osm.org/keys/ref:linz:t50_fid

Hi, if you're going to map sidewalks please connect them to the road network at every crossing.

Otherwise it causes very misleading directions - for example, take a look at this suggesting walking route: osm.org/directions?engine=fossgis_osrm_foot&route=-37.79838%2C175.23689%3B-37.80098%2C175.23742#map=18/-37.80008/175.23717

Hi, please see comments on changeset/125462175

Hi, these are not tertiary roads. Please see highway=*#Highway for information about the different types of roads in OSM

Hi, are you sure the maximum speed is 65km/h? In New Zealand, there is no such thing as maxspeed=65.

It would either be 60 or 70 (red/white sign). 55/65/75 etc (yellow signs) are maxspeed:advisory

I've deleted the overlapping building and it replaced it with a node representing the business on level 6

Fonterra moved out of this building 6 years ago... reverted.

https://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/fonterras-ex-hq-to-be-apartments/K6TRKOROCN46OUGDMN5EMM4NLE/