please don't ignore the errors in the editor. If it shows a mistake, you should fix it

thanks for all your edits! not sure if you're aware, but mapping details of bus depots somewhat helps AT's staff, since their software seems to use OpenStreetMap as a basemap - see timecode 00:10 in this video: https://facebook.com/reel/780615961728556

so keep up the good work :)

sure, done

*painted

whoops, yeah this was totally broken. changed to a simple multipolygon: relation/17558978

the linked wikidata entry answers this question with a surprisingly detailed answer. so i've restored the relation

heya, shall we delete it then? this would be more suitable for https://openhistoricalmap.org

thanks for your edits! if the gate is private, then this implies that the road on the east side of the gate is also private, right?

another tip: after drawing an area, you can press Q on your keyboard to 'square' the building, so that it's a proper rectangle shape

please use changeset comments to describe your edits. It looks like you deleted a number of important tags and changed the university to a high school.

Without no changeset comment or explanation, it is likely that someone will just revert strange edits like this

Hi, please write a comment to describe your edits when you upload them. Otherwise it wastes time for reviewers, please see osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments for details

sorry, this one is fixed as well. we've got a code fix ready in iD to prevent this from happening, but it will likely be a few more months before it's released: https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/pull/11734#pullrequestreview-3630412351

thanks, is a typo, fixed now

thanks, this one fixed as well

Hi Stephen, it looked complete, but there was a temporary fence blocking access around node/13325879916

feel free to change it to construction, i won't be back any time soon to check

Hi Warin, thanks your recent comments. All the multipolygon issues should be fixed now. And cheers for fixing the massive broken forest. I'll check back once the validator has updated

also as an FYI, I'm working on improvements to iD (https://github.com/ideditor/schema-builder/pull/174 ) so there'll be a warning in the edito rif type=boundary isn't closed, or isn't geometrically valid. hopefully that will prevent these kinds of issues in the future

hey phoebe, could you take a look at node/12600563378 please - the name=* and name:mi=* tags seem to contradict each other.

Is this a copy-paste error? or if not, should we add alt_name:mi=* to avoid confusion?

Hi Andy, these riverbanks/islands change after every flood, and I guess DOC doesn't update the legal boundaries when that happens, which is why we get such a mismatch.

I've merged these boundaries together now to keep this area more organized , so feel free to keep editing around here :)

Cheers,
Kyle

Hi, what are you trying to achieve with these edits?

if you ignore those validator warnings, it creates an enourmous mess that someone will probably revert.

we don't map each individual lane as a lane, the previous layout was already correct...

you changed the entire 600km² forest (relation/2891664 ) into scrub - is that intentional?