β€οΈβπ₯'s Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 95904729 | nice work! i would suggest using `building=roof` in some cases instead of `amenity=shelter` & `building=yes` but that's pretty trivial π€·ββοΈ fyi i've made some minor changes to nearby features that you didn't touch: changeset/95915154
|
|
| 94757272 | cool i've added it |
|
| 94757272 | i think way/843363858 should still be oneway=alternating? it has a one-lane-bridge sign where the 2 lanes+median+cyclelanes go down to 1 lane that's barely wider than a driveway |
|
| 95036438 | sorry, thanks for fixing that!
|
|
| 94306997 | You also removed `highway=pedestrian` from the John Hood Plaza which I've reverted too. See highway=pedestrian for more info on how plazas/squares are mapped. |
|
| 94306997 | Hi, you removed the `building=yes` tag from the interim sports centre. Since it is a building, that tag should remain. I've added it back. |
|
| 94136273 | hmm not sure if place=neighbourhood was the right tag... |
|
| 93631629 | oops, sorry π
|
|
| 93631629 | hi, yes the two rain shelters you changed should not have social_facility=shelter, but I think the Wellington Night Shelter _should_ have that tag (way/261472341) - unless I've misunderstood something?
|
|
| 93569009 | also, you turned a building into a landuse feature. The AUT student apartments should be tagged as `building=apartments`, not `landuse=residential` |
|
| 93569009 | this building is near the top of the symonds street hill, the elevation definitely isn't 0 masl
|
|
| 80673261 | oh oops, didn't realise that. So should the beach be drawn on the seaward side of the coastline as well, or only between the backshore and the the high water mark? wiki page isn't clear |
|
| 91917159 | sorry this was me, I saw a sign that said "Residents access only" so I assumed that was a permanent change |
|
| 91568479 | reverted in changeset/91694519, also updated the route to tie into the new roads in the KΔinga Ora development |
|
| 91568479 | Hi, you changed the status of the New Lynn to Avondale shared path from "construction" to "proposed" Could you please explain why you made that change? Construction is underway right now, see page 3 of https://at.govt.nz/media/1983299/at-new-lynn-avondale-path-newsletter-july-2020.pdf Construction is also clearly visible on Maxar Satellite Imagery |
|
| 91259111 | Hi, the AMETI shared path has already been mapped. You've added another shared path next to the existing one. It's confusing in the iD editor because the shared path and the busway are rendered the same, but one has construction=cycleway and one has construction=unclassified. If you take a look at the map (e.g. here: osm.org/#map=19/-36.90811/174.85871) you can see that there are now two shared paths along the busway |
|
| 91011275 | You renamed the hamlet "Kuratau Junction" to "Kuratau", but I think that's wrong, Kuratau is the lakeside village here: node/1448689686 |
|
| 90751778 | oh sorry, I was looking at a cached version of the map. I thought you made the opposite change...
|
|
| 90751778 | Are you sure about this? I'm pretty sure the π·π³ sign is at the roundabout itself |
|
| 90511578 | Hi, thanks for the contribution! If cycleways are not physically separated from the car lanes, the convention is to add a tag to the existing road instead of drawing the cycle lane separately. In this case, you could just add cycleway:left=lane to Domain Drive. Here's an example: way/29849581 |