OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
95904729

nice work! i would suggest using `building=roof` in some cases instead of `amenity=shelter` & `building=yes` but that's pretty trivial πŸ€·β€β™€οΈ

fyi i've made some minor changes to nearby features that you didn't touch: changeset/95915154
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95904729

94757272

cool i've added it

94757272

i think way/843363858 should still be oneway=alternating? it has a one-lane-bridge sign where the 2 lanes+median+cyclelanes go down to 1 lane that's barely wider than a driveway

95036438

sorry, thanks for fixing that!
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95036438

94306997

You also removed `highway=pedestrian` from the John Hood Plaza which I've reverted too. See highway=pedestrian for more info on how plazas/squares are mapped.

94306997

Hi, you removed the `building=yes` tag from the interim sports centre. Since it is a building, that tag should remain. I've added it back.

94136273

hmm not sure if place=neighbourhood was the right tag...

93631629

oops, sorry πŸ‘
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93631629

93631629

hi, yes the two rain shelters you changed should not have social_facility=shelter, but I think the Wellington Night Shelter _should_ have that tag (way/261472341) - unless I've misunderstood something?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93631629

93569009

also, you turned a building into a landuse feature. The AUT student apartments should be tagged as `building=apartments`, not `landuse=residential`

93569009

this building is near the top of the symonds street hill, the elevation definitely isn't 0 masl
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93569009

80673261

oh oops, didn't realise that. So should the beach be drawn on the seaward side of the coastline as well, or only between the backshore and the the high water mark? wiki page isn't clear

91917159

sorry this was me, I saw a sign that said "Residents access only" so I assumed that was a permanent change

91568479

reverted in changeset/91694519, also updated the route to tie into the new roads in the Kāinga Ora development

91568479

Hi, you changed the status of the New Lynn to Avondale shared path from "construction" to "proposed"

Could you please explain why you made that change? Construction is underway right now, see page 3 of https://at.govt.nz/media/1983299/at-new-lynn-avondale-path-newsletter-july-2020.pdf Construction is also clearly visible on Maxar Satellite Imagery

91259111

Hi, the AMETI shared path has already been mapped. You've added another shared path next to the existing one.

It's confusing in the iD editor because the shared path and the busway are rendered the same, but one has construction=cycleway and one has construction=unclassified.

If you take a look at the map (e.g. here: osm.org/#map=19/-36.90811/174.85871) you can see that there are now two shared paths along the busway

91011275

You renamed the hamlet "Kuratau Junction" to "Kuratau", but I think that's wrong, Kuratau is the lakeside village here: node/1448689686

90751778

oh sorry, I was looking at a cached version of the map. I thought you made the opposite change...
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90751778

90751778

Are you sure about this? I'm pretty sure the 🚷🚳 sign is at the roundabout itself

90511578

Hi, thanks for the contribution! If cycleways are not physically separated from the car lanes, the convention is to add a tag to the existing road instead of drawing the cycle lane separately. In this case, you could just add cycleway:left=lane to Domain Drive. Here's an example: way/29849581