Hi, unfortunately NZ Post data is copyrighted so we can't add this information to OSM...

Hi, what source did you use for this edit? This business has no address on their website, and this seems to be a private residential home. Are you sure that this information is meant to be public?

Hi, thanks for your recent edits. hgv=no means all trucks are banned, i.e. anyone over 3.5 tonnes. Is that what the signage here says?

If you just want to tag the maximum weight, there is an example here which explains how to map the complicated NZ signage: maxaxleload=*

Hey, you requested a review on these edits - everything looks good, thanks for fixing the issue.

FYI the software bug which caused these leftover construction tags was fixed in 2022, but this road was last updated in 2021 which is why it was still in a broken state. (See https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema/pull/416)

There are 211 other roads in NZ which are still broken like this one... I'll fix these later tonight

sorry, I didn't realise the validator was that strict... I've moved it to a different platform for now, will revert in a few weeks when the track opens

what do you think about applying the suggestions from this comment? https://github.com/osm-search/Nominatim/discussions/3418#discussioncomment-9382615

i.e. change it to type=multipolygon + landuse=education?

thanks for your edit, I've fixed the formatting of the opening hours

thanks for linking to that discussion. I'm not sure what the best way of tagging it is, but I believe the renderers insist on type=multipolygon for landuse (at the moment it doesn't render in the default style, nor OSMAnd)

Hi, this edit has broken the rendering of this area in many different renderers.

Could you help me understand why it can't be mapped as type=multipolygon? I see 30,000 other schools and universities in the database which are multipolygons

Hi, are you sure that the street address of this building is correct? It looks like 492 is actually on the other side of the road

Sure, I assumed that it was okay to map this, given how many similar proposals are mapped around Sydney

The relation is currently being used on the wikipedia page, so please give me a day or 2 before you delete it, so I can figure out how to retain the map on wikipedia

hey, you requested a review on a few of your edits. My main suggestion would be to write a meaningful comment when you upload your changes. This saves a lot of time for reviewers, and helps everyone to understand what you're trying to do. It's hard to provide feedback if we don't know what your intention is :)

There's some more info on this page: osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Hi, could you please expain why you deleted these suburbs? They seem to be well established names. You may also want to join the discussion at note/2367238

hey, since I didn't hear back from you i've added the path back, but this time with `access=private`

Hi, you probably won't get a response from one of the original import accounts. If you're interested, there's a list of all the discardable tags here: osm.wiki/LINZ/Invented_Tags#Deprecated_Tags

Hi, do you think it would be appropriate to use highway=pedestrian for these roads that are only accessible to pedestrians and private/maintenance vehicles?

hey, have you seen note/4117160 and note/4117153 ? sounds like the new bridge is open

Hi, I've walked past here a few times, the walkway still exists and it is open to the public when the restaurants are closed

maybe we should keep the path but tag it as access=private + foot=permissive?

👍 I've started a wiki page for this idea: osm.wiki/Proposal:Platform_exits

it took a while but we got there :)

the map is now live on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sydney_Writers_Walk