Hi, thanks for flagging this relation with gaps, I fixed it.
As for using roads in boundaries relations, I see your point but I tend to disagree for some cases.
For example some of our local boundaries, like political wards, are literally defined by roads in the official documents so boundary passes on a centerline of a road. This are the only ones I'm touching.
Are you suggesting snapping boundary ways to highways is the best practice in this case? Because most QA tools would complain for "overlapping ways". Not to mention these overlapping ways can be hard to deal with, especially for new mappers.

Hi, this intersection was fully reconfigured 2 years ago and it was properly mapped before you "fixed" it. See Bing (at lower zoom levels), Esri imagery.
I'll restore it but please don't do it again. Thanks.

Sounds good. Usually if it's just the street name that is wrong you can change the addr:street for the nodes and leave it like that.
If you are positive that house numbers are wrong then sure feel free to delete it.

Is there any reason why you are deleting address interpolations? Please don't.

I think I've already cleaned up most if not all of the duplicates. Thanks for your contribution.

Hi,
You've added many duplicate drinking fountains. Please review your edits.
Also your links to images don't work. Getting error 404.
For images it's best to use Mapillary and mapillary tag: osm.wiki/Mapillary

Are you sure there is a sidewalk on Sebring? Nothing on Bing-2018.

Hi,
Please read Maproullette challenge instructions. It asks specifically to add additional tags. amenity=social_facility is too broad.
Please review your changesets and add these two:
social_facility:for=senior
social_facility=assisted_living

I wouldn't say it's that big of a deal, it just doesn't add much to the map. If you are interested in helping OSM grow I suggest launching iD editor and add some new features around, like pathways, sidewalks, parking aisles, crossings, new buildings, benches, etc. Gatineau could definitely use some help.
osm.org/edit?editor=id&changeset=71708696#map=16/45.4372/-75.7861

I personally like "Highway 416" better because that's how all people I know call it.

Veterans Memorial Highway should be in alt_name

Hello,
Is there any reason you are tagging service roads with lanes=2?
'lanes' tag should ONLY be used on roads with MARKED lanes. That's what it was introduced for specifically and it shouldn't be used to specify that it's a two-way road (it is assumed by default): lanes=*

What's your criteria to differentiate between residential/unclassified?

Here's mine: if most of the houses are within a stone throw from each other then it's residential. Otherwise it's unclassified.

Here's from general wiki:
"highway=unclassified should be used for roads used for local traffic, and for roads used to connect other towns, villages or hamlets." highway=unclassified

Here's from Canadian tagging guidelines:
"An highway=unclassified road would be considered rural roads that are not provincial or national highways network." highway=unclassified

IMO most of our rural roads should be unclassified.

Danny,
Not sure I would classify most of these roads as highway=residential when there are often no residential houses for miles
IMO they are more of a highway=unclassified: highway=residential

What do you think?

Hi,
Pretty obvious "bicyle_parking" key was meant to be "bicycle_parking"
Could've just changed the key...
Just sayin

Sounds good. You should remove `cycleway=yes` tag completely. It's supposed to be used on roads only.

If you want to indicate that this pathway is mostly used by bikes you can change main "highway=path" tag to "highway=cycleway" (just make sure you have "foot=yes" though).

Hi,

Noticed you tagged pathway with "cycleway=shared_lane" tag. That is incorrect. This tag should be used on roads to indicate that bicycles should share the lane with motor vehicles. See wiki: cycleway=*

If you want to indicate that bicycles should share pathway with pedestrians you should use "segregated=no" tag. See wiki: segregated=no

Pathways tagged with "highway=path" already presume that bike/walk traffic is not segregated, so this tag is redundant.

If I recall they were glued to the corners of a building and were essentially useless,i.e. 100-----100 Bank St. If you see interpolation way without addresses feel free to remove it

Actually I only did it in Ottawa. If you want me to do it in Gatineau as well let me know.

No. I cleaned up what I was able to find, thanks.

I also draw separate crossing way when sidewalk bends and you can't connect it anyway.