zzptichka's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 56921370 | Is this road still closed 8 months later? |
|
| 60133299 | Fixed |
|
| 63431668 | Good catch ;) |
|
| 63383733 | Hi, Welcome to OSM.
|
|
| 63026834 | Fixed |
|
| 63114213 | Noticed you've tagged a few links with 'destination:ref=50 Quest'
|
|
| 61230653 | Looking good. Welcome to OSM.
|
|
| 60053037 | There is nothing duplicate about outlining bridge polygon and it's actually encouraged:
|
|
| 59568328 | Is it gravel? Rails have been removed? |
|
| 59568328 | Pretty sure this trail is still being planned and hasn't been built yet. Any reason to tag it as path? |
|
| 59374791 | Hi Danny,
Do you mind tagging surface=* at least (ideally width too) when adding new paths? I'm looking after a cycling routing project and there is quite a big difference between a goat path and a MUP when it comes to routing.
|
|
| 58895563 | Looks like you tagged this stream as a path by mistake: way/113324967 |
|
| 58722300 | That's what I'm using like you showed me :)
|
|
| 57604134 | Sure why not.
|
|
| 57604134 | Tagging features physically present on the ground. Since railway was completely replaced by a path and nothing reminds about it I chose to remove it. Besides, IIRC this tag was inconsistent from one segment to another and the path was swerving here and there. |
|
| 58462113 | Yes, fixed it |
|
| 58410875 | You're right. Fixed it. |
|
| 58343932 | Pretty sure this tag has no meaning on a way `direction=forward` should be used on nodes, i.e. stop sign, bus stop that are part of a way, not way itself |
|
| 52052030 | Thought I'd let you know that these sidewalks you mapped here are essentially useless and unroutable without any crossings. You might want to revisit them and connect to roads. Cheers. |
|
| 58066457 | These roads are used by Park&Ride general traffic, even the ramp. Otherwise there is no way for cars to get on the parking lot. |