Hello mk4th,

Thank you for your edits!

In this edit you have added this gate:
node/9777677532/history

What is the meaning of locked=yes together with access=yes?

שלום דוד-צבי,

בעריכה זו הוספת את השער
node/10548878749

מה המשמעות של השילוב בין שער נעול עם כניסה חופשית?

access=permissive
locked=yes

תודה!

Good Luck!

Dear Rawad,

The Israeli community does a lot of OSM mapping and quality improvements in the west bank. This community has noticed this improper import within a day of its start.
I encourage you to put aside the complex middle-eastern politics and leverage the knowledge and expertise of the OSM Israel community.

Hello Rawad,
Thank you for replying.
The relevant local community for discussion is OSM Israel -
https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/il/50

I have sent a message with details of my messages above to the DWG

For the record:
At the time of submitting the above message user Rawad had a total of 630 edits. 4 of them have before this bulk import - a year or more ago.

According to
https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1rqb
in 48 hours, user Rawad has created 5,569,398 nodes and 509,534 ways.

Hello Rawad,

This is the first of hundreds of changesets you uploaded in the past two days. Most of the changes include the maximal number of node per changeset.

You write "knowledge" as the source of millions of nodes. This is definitely not "personal knowledge".

Have you followed the OSM
guidelines, code of conduct and other requirements as described in
osm.wiki/Import ?

It is not lilekly.

In this changeset alone we see that the imported buildings are duplicating previous versions of the buildings.

I request that you stop the import until the process is reviewed by the community and/or the Data Working Group.

Best regards,
Zeev

תודה על העברת התמונה למעלה עצמו!

זאב

I've deleted this GPX trace as the roads were already mapped.
Thanks!

Fixed. Thanks!

שלום דב

תודה על תרומתך למיפוי ב
OSM

אנא המנע מהעתקת מידע ממקורות שאינם חופשיים. הדבר עלול לפגוע בחופשיות המידע ב
OSM

תודה
זאב מצוות IHM

We can have a separate discussion about IHM via e-mail.

This is about OSM and its practices, such as "Don't use name tag to describe things" and "Don't map temporary events and temporary features"

See osm.wiki/Good_practice

שלום יצחק,

OSM
זה לא מקום להכנסת הודעות למטיילים על ידי יצירת מיפוי פקטיבי

אני מעדיף שאתה תמחוק את הנקודה שייצרת

שלום אורי,

תודה על תרומתך למיפוי OSM.

אנא המנע מכל צורה של העתקה ממקורות לא חופשיים. העתרות אלו מסכנות את חופשיות המידע ב OSM ומנוגדות לתנאי השימוש ב OSM וב IHM.

בברכה,
זאב

That's what I did
> I have restored the multi-polygon

You are welcome to join the OSM Israel telegram channel where you can get advice and support from fellow mappers:
https://t.me/OSM_Israel

I have restored the multi-polygon

Hello Flayer,

Thank you for your continued contribution to OSM mapping!

In this old edit, a large section of Hakdoshim forest, between road 1 and road 395, was deleted from the relation.

The deleted area included 3 "inner" members that still exist in the relation, which make it an invalid multi-polygon.

Was this done by mistake?

Helloo Sokuya,

Thank you for your continued contribution to OSM.

There is no need to create a relation for buildings. In fact, in most cases it is impossible to create a valid "multipolygon" relation for a building.

Please see
building:part=*
for description of mapping the different building parts, and
osm.wiki/Simple_3D_Buildings
for a more detailed description of 3D descriptions for buildings.

Best regards,
Zeev