האם השביל שמיפית בראש החומה צריך לעבור גם מעל שער יפו
?

Hi RTtect,
.
Recently you have created several ways that have no tags. Could you review the list at
.
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/qDb
.
and either fix or delete them.
.
Thanks!

Hi,
.
Can you please define way/489813779 because it currently has no tags.
.
Thanks!

Hi,
.
Can you please check out way/509526625 because it has no tags.
.
Moreover, it is a few meters in size, yet it has 60 nodes...

הורדתי את תגית הצבע מהשביל ועכשיו זה בסדר
changeset/50598869

I'm not an historian, but I think there was a no man's land area/שטח מפורז between the Israeli-controlled and the Jordanian-controlled areas.

I appreciate your listening and open-mindness!

A dispute can only be on a boundary claimed by some entity. No claim implies no dispute. way/288825225 is part of the boundary claimed by Palestine and disputed by Israel.
.
way/294464667 is not claimed to be a boundary by any entity - neither Palestine nor Israel. Therefore it is not a boundary and should not be rendered.
.
If the Palestine claims its boundary at the location of 294464667, or any other location, then it should be used rather than 288825225.

If you refer to way/288825225, then it is a member of a (disputed) boundary=administrative admin_level=2 relation - relation/1703814

I think that the line should not be rendered.

Yes, I'm the original mapper of all recently corrected entries, and they should have been "natural=cave_entrance" in the first place.
@SomeoneElse: The osm.wiki/Proposal_process says a proposal can be approved by voting. osm.wiki/Proposed_features/natural%3Dcave says it is in draft status. Therefore, it is not approved yet.

I've fixed the trail type. changeset/50499250

It looks like the trails are created (the "operated" tag) by this local organization: "תיירות חבל בנימין", and that's why they are not mentioned by the ITC.
.
I've added a hiking route relation in changeset/50495664. Would you like to add similar relations for the other hiking routes you've added?

If the 1949 armistice line is an historical line. Currently, it does not serve as an administrative boundary, not even a disputed boundary, because it was superseded by the Oslo agreements.
.
osm.org/welcome says: "What it [the map] doesn't include is opinionated data like ratings, historical or hypothetical features, and data from copyrighted sources."

Thanks! I didn't notice the "building:part" tag...

The proposed "natural=cave" proposal applies to ways and areas.
.
I therefore changed/reverted all "natural=cave" nodes in Israel and Palestine to "natural=cave_entrance".

Hi,
.
After this update, the red trail has a Y shape:
.
http://israelhiking.osm.org.il/#!/18/32.7894/34.9783
.
Is this OK?

Hi Yaniv,
.
Thanks for adding the marked trails south of Sdemot Mehola.
.
It looks like there is a strange split in the green trail:
.
http://israelhiking.osm.org.il/#!/15/32.3304/35.5185
.
Isn't there a blue trail going east-west?
.
Please let me know if you need any help editing.

Is these new ways part of an officially marked ITC red trail?
.
It does not appear on the marked trails map or at the update page https://www.teva.org.il/?CategoryID=279&ArticleID=442

Is this new way way/506220396 an officially marked ITC red trail?
.
It does not appear on the marked trails map or at the update page https://www.teva.org.il/?CategoryID=279&ArticleID=442