Hi Tbeeper24
Thanks very much for be part of OSM. Just wanted to let you know that for add objects on OSM tha OSM community should have local knowledge or add these objects using open source.

Hi dahliarj
Thanks for contributing on OSM. I was discovering about the name of this gym in the web, for this reason I changed the name, but you returned to put the prior name. Can you explian me why? What is your source or is local knowledge?

Hi Tbeeper24
Thank you for contributing on OSM. I noticed that on your change you is using source Bing, for this reason I deleted those objects. Maybe did you use other source or are you knowledge local?

Hi DavidKewley,
Thanks for pointing this out. My main source was Strava Cycling Imagery, as per your comment I re-checked Bing and Mapbox Imagery and I agree with you. I restored the cycleway and fixed the connection.
Thank you!

Hi
Thanks for contributing on OSM. But, please. You should have more careful in your editions in differentiate the labels from the roads.

Hi
Thanks for contributing on OSM. But, please. You should have more careful in your editions in differentiate the labels from the roads.

Hi Nuting Like a good Nut,
I noticed you deleted portion of the tertiary road. Since, the road is important, I have reverted its set of changes to recover the lost data. Be careful when editing in OSM and make sure you do not remove valuable data.

Hi Iowa Kid.
Thank you for contributing to OSM. I noticed you added a point of interest (POI) in an area where there isn't a place to add the tag amenity= fast_food.

Oh great, thanks for the datum.

Yes, please. These roads is transitables for vehicles and not people. Fix your changesets similar to these.

Hi there. Thanks for pointing this out, I though it was missing since it's clearly visible in the satellite imagery, I've already reverted it.

Thank you for contributing to OSM. I noticed you added paths and a stream, but the stream and highway shouldn't be connected. I've corrected this, separating nodes connection between stream and road.

Hi Cosmos.
Thank you for contributing to OSM. I noticed that you added tag oneway =yes to an road very long (way/153771275). ¿Are you knowledgeable of this area? Because, there are other roads more in this area ¿Are you certain?
It is important this theme, the comunity need to know if the roads son uniderectional or biridirectional. Please, check your change.

Hi Edianta.
Thank you for contributing to OSM. I noticed that you added tag oneway =yes to an road very long (way/386347141). ¿Are you knowledgeable of this area? ¿Are you certain?
It is important this theme, the comunity need to know if the roads son uniderectional or biridirectional. Please, check your change.

Hi Arus.
Thank you for contributing to OSM. I noticed that you added tag oneway =yes to some roads. In this road (way/128149664) not has coherence with the road consecutive ¿Are you knowledgeable of this area? ¿Are you certain?
It is important this theme, the comunity need to know if the roads son uniderectional or biridirectional. Please, check your change.

Hi mcheckimport.
Thank you for contributing to OSM. I noticed that you added tag oneway =yes to this road (way/273095332). ¿Are you knowledgeable of this area? ¿Are you certain?
It is important this theme, the comunity need to know if the roads son uniderectional or biridirectional. Please, check your change.

Hi Valiscook.
Thank you for contributing to OSM. I noticed that you added tag oneway =yes to this road (way/217431438). ¿Are you knowledgeable of this area? ¿Are you certain?
It is important this theme, the comunity need to know if the roads son uniderectional or biridirectional. Please, check your change.

Hi Ruby Reah Angulo.
Thank you for contributing to OSM. I noticed that you added tag oneway =yes to an extensive road. ¿Are you knowledgeable of this area? ¿Are you certain?

A case similar in this change: way/474039507/history

Hi Liju Thomas
Thank you for contributing to OSM. I noticed you added the highway that isn't visible on satellite imagery. ¿Are you updating this highway based on any special source?