reverted: mass changes using not on-the-ground checking, but some undetermined sources, possibly simply aerial imagery; including incorrect surface tagging (asphalt instead of unpaved or sett), incorrect addresses to buildings etc.

changeset/177188514

reverted for node/7117622289 & node/7117622294

changeset/177175070

Hi! This needs to be partly reverted (or possibly in full). The aerial imagery from gov.ge is relevant as of March 2024 (and there isn't any imagery available for mapping from 2025), but many things have changed since that time. For example, node/7117622289 & node/7117622294 have been relocated eastward, just like they were mapped before your edit.
Please check the situation on the ground before making edits basing solely on the aerial imagery.

Isn't the lift gate *behind* the regular gate, which is open at some times but closed at others?
https://yandex.com.ge/maps/-/CLdIVQMr

Hmm... The intention of way/1266937816 was to represent both a cycleway and a pedestrian way, as they are not physically segregated. This is why the way was drawn as something in the middle between the actual cycleway and the border of pedestrian space. In contrast to this, way/1266937829 represents only cycleway, as there is no pedestrian space nearby.

However, it may be better indeed to draw them separately... In this case the pedestrian way needs to be added; but maybe it would be better to draw it as an area, not as a line.

This one, I meant: way/1464595667

Hasn't this building been demolished following the renovation of the street and the opening of the tunnel?

reverted — these are not underground passages, but rather indoor passages. More careful "fixing" is required

changeset/176918077

reverted, vandalism

changeset/176854146

reverted, vandalism

changeset/176854139

thnx!

reverted wrt way/1263096014 & way/1261354298 : even though they are not "official", these ground paths do exist

changeset/176837569

once again reverted - no separate way exists; this is not an entrance; there is no sidewalk. Continued unconstructed edits may qualify as vandalism and lead to blocking

changeset/176791417

once again reverted - no separate way exists; this is not an entrance; there is no sidewalk. Continued unconstructed edits may qualify as vandalism and lead to blocking

changeset/176791417

once again reverted - no separate way exists; this is not an entrance; there is no sidewalk. Continued unconstructed edits may qualify as vandalism and lead to blocking

changeset/176791417

reverted - no separate way exists

changeset/176761230

reverted - not every crossing of building and footpath is an entrance; it's marked separately, node/10803344311

changeset/176761221

reverted - not every crossing of a footpath and a building is an entrance. StreetComplete should be fixed instead

changeset/176650298

rv wrt way/65069849 - unexplained removal of name (repeatedly)

changeset/176649663

Just a small note: the road leading to a parking lot should be tagged just as highway=service, without service=parking_aisle. Even the "main" road within parking lot that is necessarily used by cars to get in and out is just plain highway=service. The tag service=parking_aisle should only be used for smaller inner roads within the parking lot that separate rows of individual parking spaces.