Hi! Sorry, but I've reverted this edit due to a number of strange changes to ways like way/28519605, way/1343565520, way/1054161801, way/1053324783 and others. My guess is that the editor that you used had some strange validation patterns turned on and produced some unwanted changes. Could you repeat the desired changes once again without that validation patterns?

changeset/160526942

partly reverted WRT landuses

changeset/160225279

Reverted: Even though it is called "Dighomi village" officially, it doesn't fit the OpenStreetMap definition for place=village; hence place=neighbourhood.

note/4389288
Lile or Lite? ლილე or ლითე?

Hi! 240₾ per a single swimming session seems to be too much. Or is that the price for a subscription? In any case, some qualifier should be added...

fix boundary geometry

changeset/159790969

fix boundary geometry

changeset/159790935

I've restored the paths: I confirm their existence as of 2024-11-21. Admittedly, they aren't easy to follow, so I've added the respective tags (sac_scale, trail_visibility, obstacle). But it's possible to use them.

reverted: this is not the main entrance to the residential building (I don't know its precise location), only an entrance to a hotel also located in this building

Yes, I just accidentally copied this key-value from the relation in which this house was the only member. Thanks for notifying.

reverted: everything was mapped correctly, one of the service roads in located on a bridge and leads into a building, there is no crossing with the road below as they are on different levels

Reverted: the name is spelt like this in English, see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Petras_Vilei%C5%A1is . There is no restriction on using Extended Latin characters in name:en.

Yes, it's the same, and it was previously mapped by me more to the north: https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/node/10906078478 . When ks1v relocated it, as well as adding the building and the retaining wall, I did not argue, thinking that he knows better... Apparently not.

Yes, if you just climb over those metal beams (it's not really difficult), you can do down the stairs. I did that 2 or 3 times, and judging by the more or less beaten path, I'm not the only one.

partly reverted: the passage is possible, there is a fence with a stile node: way/1285003406

Mostly reverted in changeset/158303567 : the buildings have already been mapped

Ну вот конкретно для всяческих улиц Пятилеток можно проставить в name:etymology:wikidata ссылки на:
https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q1661958
https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q4127949
https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q4462653
https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q4515033
https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q18635124
https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q18643856
https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q47092870
https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q19873131
https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q7039206
https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q7700864
https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q5359806

Отмечу, что хоть "улица 4-й Пятилетки" и "улица 9-й Пятилетки" и были некорректно прилинкованы к записи о пятилетках, но есть записи на викиданных о конкретных пятилетках, и можно бы вернуть ссылки уже на них:
https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q4515033
https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q7039206

Partly reverted in changeset/158061623 : this path exists, even though it's unpaved and hard to follow

Ура!
Ещё есть жуткие "Новая улица" с подобными ссылками, из того, что видел.

So, what are the results of testing?
node/11497113302/history