Hi mappingSP,

Thanks for looking into our edits. The edit made here was based on the parking aisles painted and presence of vehicles. So our editor added service road. Please suggest any further modifications to this if any, so that we can add it from the next time.

We are always happy to engage with OSM community.

Regards,
yaswap.

Hi ToniE,
Thanks for looking into the edit.There was some issue while creating the segments. It got uploaded twice after saving the edits. We have removed the duplicate segments and retained the correct one.
Do let us know if there are any other issues from our end. We are looking forward to collaborate with the local community and learn more from them.
Regards,
yaswap.

Hi Phil,
Thanks for looking into the edit. Generally these type of errors wont happen. The editor might have turned off the building feature by mistake. We had a connect with the editor and explained it. We have edited the building feature as per the Bing Aerial imagery.

Do let us know if there are any other issues from our end.We are looking forward to collaborate with the local community and learn more from them.

Regards,
yaswap.

Hi CrypticKryptos,

Thanks for your update. Addatla has made the edits based on the various satellite imageries and Street side present in OSM. None of them has a sign of area under construction.So he added the road segments. However we value the local knowledge the OSM community possess and bring to table. We are always happy to engage with OSM community and learn from them.

Regards,
yaswap.

Hi reidpelton,
Please look into this changeset https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/65182946?filters=%7B%22date__gte%22%3A%5B%7B%22label%22%3A%22%22%2C%22value%22%3A%22%22%7D%5D%2C%22ids%22%3A%5B%7B%22label%22%3A%2265182946%22%2C%22value%22%3A%2265182946%22%7D%5D%7D. You can see how the street looks before our edit.

Please let us know if you have any suggestions.
Regards,
yaswap.

Hi trigpoint,
Thanks for looking into our edits. Can you please let us know what are car parks ?

Please let us know if you have any suggestions..
Regards,
yaswap.

Hi ndm,
Thanks for looking into our edits.As bing satellite imagery is of 17th JUNE 2017 so we thought it is an accurate data to create the missing roads in this region.Please go ahead and change the data if you have local knowledge of recent changes.
Please let us know if there are any further improvements.
Regards,
yaswap.

Hi ndm,
Thanks for looking into our edits. In Bing street side it looked like a gated community so added the gate at the entrance. From your comment we did a deep dive and it doesn't look like a gate. I will go ahead and remove it.
Thanks again for your inputs. Please let us know if there are any other suggestions.
Regards,
yaswap.

Hi ndm,
Thanks for responding back. As per OSM wiki access=private roads leading to private home are supposed to be tagged with access-private. Also we saw these houses were having closed gateways at the entrance.That is the reason we added private tags to these houses.
Please let us know if this is wrong. We will work accordingly.
Regards,
yaswap.

Hi ndm,
Thanks for looking into this edit. In this case mhdrahm added service roads which are not very clear in satellite imagery. That is why during our quality check we asked him to delete those roads and add roads that are clearly visible in satellite imagery. This is just to make sure high quality data enters OSM from our end.

Coming to your second question on private roads we clearly see that these are closed ways leading to entities via satellite and Street side. That is why these are added as private roads.

Please let us know if there are any further suggestions to improve our process. We are actively looking forward to engage with local community and learn more from them.

Regards,
yaswap.

Thanks for the update, Syl. Our editor accidentally moved the node of RUE DE RENNES. We have had a quick connect with the editor who has acknowledged the mistake and will ensure he does not repeat such mistakes.

Please let us know if you have any recommendations or suggestions. We are always happy to engage with local OSM community and learn from them.

Hi,
What is the source of your edit?

Can you explain the edit, on what basis the direction has been given??

Thanks for the update,ndm .
In some view angle of bing street side the legal median looked like a continuous one so the restriction was given. We have reverted the U-turn restriction as per your recommendation. Thank you for spending your valuable time to help us.

Please let us know if you have any recommendations or suggestions. We are always happy to engage with local OSM community and learn from them.

.:

Thanks for the update on the turn restriction.
As per your recommendation we have changed the junction connecting Leesburg pike and Arlington boulevard and connected Sleepy Hollow road to Leesburg Pike.
Thank you for your suggestions.

There are lane marks and traffic signs on the Leeseburg Pike road which show that only left and straight are allowed. We are not certain about turn from Leeseburg Pike and Sleepy Hollow road.

Thanks for the update..
We changed the Sleepy Hollow road to dual carriage way-one leading to Leeseburg Pike(right only) and the other segment incoming from Arlington Boulevard and Leeseburg Pike(at the traffic signal) as per your recommendation.
Thank you for spending your valuable time to help us.
Please let us know if you have any recommendations or suggestions. We are always happy to engage with local OSM community and learn from them.

okay that edit was accidentally done.Thanks for reverting it @will_p

That was added accidentally. thanks for looking into it.