Hello,
Can you please provide more detailed changeset comments instead of simply Quebec?

I see you have tagged numerous telephone exchanges (central offices) with the ref tag with the area code and CO code. While that may be relevant data to add, I don't believe it belongs in the ref tag.
The telecom industry uses CLLI codes <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CLLI_code> in order to reference exact sites and exact equipment.

You seem to have tagged some buildings with `communication=yes`, can you explain what that tag is?

You also seem to have added the `area=yes` tag to some buildings. That tag is not needed as buildings are considered areas by default.

Finally, you shouldn't add `Telus Quebec` to the name tag (except for the telecommunications office), it should instead be in the operator tag.

Bonjour, le nom Francais que tu as inscrit pour "Bridge Subdivision" n'est pas le bon. Le nom officiel, et ce qui est inscrit sur le terrain est "Subdivsion Bridge".

SVP ne pas changer les nom pour des nom français sans valider que c'est le bon nom.
Une simple traduction du nom ne constitue pas un bon changement.

Merci de bien valider avant de faire des changements

Here are some better factual sources of this event :

https://northernontario.ctvnews.ca/cn-begins-repairs-after-railway-bridge-collapse-in-northern-ontario-1.7003338

https://www.mprnews.org/story/2024/08/15/bridge-collapse-closes-ontario-rail-line-just-north-of-minnesota-border

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hdhNePSeqRo

https://fftimes.com/news/local-news/cn-lift-bridge-collapses/

That ABC news article is talking about the wrong bridge.
The bridge that collapsed is on the Fort Frances to Thunder Bay line (Fort Frances Subdivision) and not the one on the US/Canada border crossing the Rainy River.

I updated the proper bridge.
way/159175209

Please read the Canadian tagging guidelines for `highway==trunk`
osm.wiki/Canada/Tagging_guidelines#Trunk

Hello,
You have not discussed this edit with the community.
Your previous changeset was reverted for the same reason

hi, can you please limit your changesets to smaller areas.

The changes you made are great, just need to remember to keep the bounding box more local.

Also, please use proper source tags, as surveying across 2 continents is hard and unlikely

Wrong changeset number, changeset/144844045 is the reverted changeset

La fusion avait déjà été faite auparavant dans les données ici.

changeset/145511054

Aussi, la relation contient `admin_level=9` qui devrait etre 8

Je viens de regarder l'historique, et ce me semble que ce le soit déjà marquer comme non utiliser quand j'ai fait la modification.

Ce serais plutôt dans changeset/109480983

Bonjour Pierre,
Je me fis a ton jugement en tant qu’éditeur, tu peux annuler ce changement pour ne plus indiquez comme non utilisée.

Je n'ai malheureusement pas noter de source, mais il y avait une note dans les tags.

It is a CLLI code, which is a reference number, used in North America to reference a particular building, and at a lower level a switch inside that building
clli=*

Because it isn't a railway anymore. It's a track that has been built where the railway was. The railway no longer exists hence `railway=abandoned`.

According to the wiki, I only see a mention for `railway=rail` and that doesn't cover this situation.

Why couldn't `highway=track` be appropriate here? It reflects the real world, on the ground reality.

Please don't go reverting edits before having taken the time to comment on the changeset beforehand