Esta edición se revirtió con la autorización del Data Working Group: changeset/71793409

Saludos, Wleiva.
Tengo curiosidad acerca de varios aspectos de los cambios que han hecho aquí.
- Teniendo en cuenta el gran número de vías y nodos afectados, representa esto una importación de datos externos? ¿Cuál es la fuente de datos?
- ¿Cuál es el significado de los nombres que ha adjuntado a los nodos (por ejemplo, RPT011, RPT1203)?
- ¿Sabe que en muchos casos ha duplicado carreteras ya existentes (como en el caso de way/555538219 / way/689241370) y cuál es el propósito de esta acción?
Por favor responda a la mayor brevedad posible.
Gracias.

Greetings Marych_,

What specific ways are you concerned about? I made these edits in an attempt to make the Tashkent road network more logical; I apologize if my edits were inappropriate.

thanks for catching this; i've fixed the directionality on that way.

My apologies. My logic was that because this road does not provide access to any cities or large towns, trunk classification is not appropriate.
Let me know what you think, and please feel free to make any changes.
Thanks.

Greetings,

I understand that it was necessary to revert bad data created by a now banned user, but redundant geometry seems to have been created at way/26395615, which overlaps way/623893283. No unique data appears to be stored in the tags on this way. Would it be acceptable to you for me to delete way/26395615, or would you prefer to do this?

Thanks for pointing that out.

Thank you for pointing that out. I was basing the edit on OSM highway policy. Is there a place where I can find specific policy for Kazakhstan?

Thanks for pointing that out. I was basing the edit on OSM highway policy.

Greetings.

I don't fully understand why you repeatedly mark Shahristan ko'chesi and other city streets as Primary_link. This street is not a slip road or turning lane, and does not match the criteria laid out in the wiki at osm.wiki/Highway_link. I also note that you have marked segments of the side streets touching Shahristan ko'chesi, such as way/655872388 and way/655872386, as Primary_Link. Would you please describe your reasoning for reverting my edits?

Understood, thank you.

I understand your reasoning and accept your reversion.

I understand your reasoning and accept your reversion.

I think you're referring to way/308170533, way/308170530, and way/308170529, three segments of the P47 highway just east of Alili at 41.9800,59.6523. I noticed that all three ways had the incorrect ref data "Soviet military topographic maps". However, if you consult the history of these road segments, you'll find that this bad data was introduced by user Klimakas in early 2016, in changeset/38064979. Here are the way history and Achavi changeset viewer links; please reach out to me if you need any assistance in finding or interpreting the history of OSM data.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=38064979
way/308170533/history
way/308170530/history
way/308170533/history
Thanks.

Bueno, gracias.

¿Crees que sería más apropiado realizar una clasificación Secondary desde Bulevar José Battle y Ordóñez a lo largo de José Pedro Varela, a lo largo de Pavón y Oswaldo Cruz, hasta la intersección de José Belloni?

Bueno, gracias

Saludos,

¿Quizás sería mejor extender la clasificación de Primaria para conectar con Camino Maldonado en -34.85524, -56.13168?

Gracias por explicar este asunto. Mi razonamiento fue que, dado que la Ruta 78, que conduce a la ciudad de 25 de Agosto, era Tertiary, la Ruta 79 que conduce a Ituzaingó, una ciudad de tamaño similar, podría tener la misma clasificación. ¿Debe la Ruta 78 ser Secondary también?

Gracias por darse cuenta de mi trabajo y mostrar esta información, estoy de acuerdo con su razonamiento.