Just wanted to say the work on this park is great! So crisp!!

Teamwork makes the dream work.

It was mostly upset about conflicts along the Gila Subdivision rail line related to the water crossings (ex:way/760268588/history#map=19/32.37332/-111.10338) I've done a scan of the ones along here and they seem in tact.

Thanks for the reply. My general feeling is that having multi-polygons with only outer members (relation/15912390) (relation/13951181) achieves very little and makes it more difficult for other editors. Entangling too much geometry into relations creates a burden down the line in my experience.

In the interest of having a more concrete discussion, I've submitted my preferred way to map things like this and would appreciate it if you could take a look and let me know if you think any nuance is lost. If I've damaged things then I can revert and will have learned something interesting.

changeset/136948759

Thanks!

Hello!
Another mapper (UrbanUnPlanner) had an open changeset when this went in and asked me to do the conflict resolution (changeset/136947123) I think your changes are all still intact but wanted to let you know in case I've botched something. Would you mind taking a look?

Hello!

The name=rumah tag should not be added. The name tag is not for description.

You can also make things look a lot more crisp by squaring corners before upload. Select a building and press the 'q' key.

Matt

Stumbled across these while doing address data addition. Nice work!

Hello!

Can you help me understand why some of the features have been grouped into multi-polygon relations when I would expect the already existing tagged ways are preferable? For example this: relation/15912391

In general, my experience is that grouping things like this just makes edits more cumbersome for other mappers and I don't see how these areas of scrub are logically "one feature".

There's also this relation that previously was a simple way way/968226915 ... the benefit is unclear.

Any clarity you can provide is appreciated.

Thanks!

Hello! Thanks for contributing. I wanted to let you know that the names on these are unnecessary and not what the name field is used for. It is only needed if the house has a specific different name. I see you already have building=house and building=yes which already indicates "RUMAN" or "BANGUNAN" respectively. You can read more about it here:
osm.wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only

I have corrected the tagging here. Let me know if there's anything else I can help with.

I've added address data along this road that should help divide East/West directional. I'm not local, would you be able to take a look and see if you can make sense of it?

Oh that looks like a decent tag. Good find Woazboat.

WestCoastNick, would you be able to adjust the tagging and move the "Permanently Closed" portion to a more suitable non-name tag?

I'm surprised to see landuse=military here. Can you help me understand?

I would guess that the name fields of "Permanently Closed" are better as note= or description= tags. osm.wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only

Wonderful. I'll give it a watch. If you're attending this year, I'd love to say hello.

Just wanted to say the parks around here look really nice. Great mapping!

Hello!

Thanks for the contribution. You can make the building crisp by squaring the corners (click the building, press 'q').

One oddity of OSM is that we store all names in unabbreviated form. In this case the street names should be expanded to their full text. It's a bit odd but keep things nice and clear.

I've done both of those edits just now so you can see what that looks like.

Happy mapping, definitely let me know if you have any questions!

That's great. A perfect edit as that's totally non-obvious to those of us mapping from afar.

landuse=residential is not used for buildings and can be removed.

Hello! Is the restroom actually in the middle of parking lot? Totally possible just a little surprising!

Welcome to OSM. Thanks for contributing.

The building outline could be tightened up to follow the roof outline a bit better. Also, one way to make sure things are nice and crisp looking is by using the "square corners" feature. Select an outline then hit 'q'.

This node is redundant and can be deleted. Also will save you some time in future mapping! :-)