OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
146764860

Gotcha, I will check it out. Thanks for the heads up.

146764860

The intent was for there to be no duplication but it's totally possible I botched it somehow. Was there some place in particular that needs some more attention from me? Happy to take a look at it.

110747741

Perfect. Thanks!

135246056

Hello! Quite a curiously shaped thing. Is this data from some source? I don't see anything listed in the few changesets I looked at but maybe I missed something. Would love to learn more.

Matt

110747741

Any chance you remember what the meaning is for the values of tiger:reviewed you have added to some of these?

ex: way/17108985/history

128500795

I just wanted to drop in to let you know that I have been standardizing a lot of the population tagging on place features. In particular, eliminating the census:population and population:census tagging in favor of population, population:date, and source:population.

The discussion is on the community forum in case tat is of interest. https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/109016

147340375

Hello! Somewhat unintuitively, waterway=fish_pass should be drawn pointing in the way the water runs. I have reversed this one as that's most common. If that is in error, please let me know!

46640462

Was doing some minor tag cleanup and the work here is lovely. Nice mapping!

146161453

Incredible work on the parking lot!!!

29419086

Hello!
This is a super old edit so no need to go wild digging things up but do you think this way (way/332312387/history) could be a ditch or maybe it's supposed to be the track road there?

It doen't seem to flow uphill when looking at 3DEP layers but also cuts across a few waterways in an unusual way.

Anyhow, just a curiosity that may need a ground survey but I figured I would ask.

98470517

Love that. I pulled up the website as soon as I saw it on OSM. Incredible. Thanks for the insight!

98470517

Hello! There's two pressurized pipelines indicated here (ex: way/902479523/history#map=18/38.01366/-107.67071) but with opposite directions. Is one pumping back up a hill? Some strange return? Would love to know more. The ice park sure is an unusual feature!

146718206

Thank you for investigating this!

146655165

Just dropping in to say nice work on the loops and waterway connectivity!

146522531

Nice! Thank you!!

146612171

Hello! Lovely edits. I wanted to point out a small fixup that the typical river area tags are natural=water + water=river. You have these as waterway=river which is only for the centerline flow way. Super easy mistake to make.

I've patched it up so don't worry about these.

Happy mapping!

146076074

Lovely work! I'm coming back through here working on the unmapped waterways (Lost Creek in this case).

43123232

Perfect. Looks great!

144922151

:thumbs-up:

144922151

The building geometry is generally really nice. A few corners could be squared a bit here and there. If you haven't tried using the building plugin in JOSM it's great and I strongly recommend. This is the method that I mostly use: https://hotosm.github.io/pdc-documentation/en/pages/03-josm/08-menggunakan-building-tools-di-josm/08_menggunakan_building_tools_di_josm/

You can also add the tags for building=house/garage etc. But leaving it as building=yes will prompt streetcomplete users who may be better able to see things on the ground. I have a lot of building=yes stuff in my changes.