vtrtsxlegend's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 139394610 | Hi Phil, Thank you again for the feedback and explanation. Taking a good look at this junction again I can clearly see now that this is not a roundabout and clearly a mistake by me. Thank you for making the corrections. Cheers. Chris |
|
| 139313349 | Hi Phil, Thank you for the feedback and explanation. Could this be defined as a traffic circle? Cheers. Chris |
|
| 137798239 | I realize that you may have already had a conversation regards tunnels and bridges near Waterloo station so apologies for reaching out again but I don't think this location was discussed. Thanks |
|
| 137798239 | Hi sirorezka, I am seeing some recent edits on this and another way where you assigned a tag of tunnel to them. These ways (roads) pass under railways that are tagged as a bridge. But per OSM specs for tunnel/bridge both should not be applied in the same location you have one or the other. I propose to remove the tunnel tag from these ways to bring inline with the spec. Cheers |
|
| 139448312 | Plus this way is connecting to a way of Bowes Road which is also tagged as Trunk Road therefore keeping it consistent. |
|
| 139448312 | I just wanted to add that I also referred to the OSM spec for Link roads and used that also in my decision. Per spec: "The _link tags are used to identify slip roads/ramps and "channelised" (most commonly physically separated) at-grade turning lanes connecting the through carriageways/through lanes of highways to other roadways of all types. _link tags should also be used for physical channelization of turning traffic lanes at traffic signal junctions and in roundabout designs that physically separate a specific turn from the main roundabout. " As this way for Bowes Road was continuing to Bowes road straight ahead it is not a link road. |
|
| 139318530 | Thank you |
|
| 139318530 | Hi again bxl-forever, Do you want me to revert the edits and restore or will you be doing so which is what I think I understood from your message? Thanks |
|
| 139318530 | Hi bxl-forever, Thank you for bringing this to my attention and for the feedback,. My apologies for my inappropriate edit and than k you for reverting my changes to make this correct again. I have learnt some valuable information and will take more care going forward to ensure that I look at the history first. Thanks again. |
|
| 138445150 | Hi Baloo Uriza, Thank you for your feedback on this changeset. We have have not completed our analysis of your comments as we are looking beyond just this changeset before concluding and getting back to you with our reply and proposed action. As it is the weekend we will conclude this on Monday so thank you for your patience. best regards. Chris
|