Hi,
what's this disconnected highway:
way/833020072/history
?
BTW: there was a warning when you closed the changeset (see changeset details)

Hi Leonte.
This changeset contains important errors: 1) none of the roads are residential. They all are part of a big farm.
2) ways 949359183 ... 949359192 are all strictly private and not open to the public.
Please do not use areal imaging alone, if you have no knowledge of the local situation. I am correcting the error in this case, but please be careful with adding things from satellite imagery without having access on imagery that allows you to see gates and vertical street signs.
Best regards
Volker (Padova, Italy)

I frgot t mention that there is a different (and older) tagging scheme for street_side parking that, in my view, is perfectly suitable in the case that triggered my comment: parking:lane=*.
Hope this is useful.

Hi, thanks for the fast reaction. My apologies for the spelling mistake. I am referring to version 1 of way/952962559. The wiki page clearly states that the tag parking=street_side "requires
amenity=parking or amenity=motorcycle_parking". That is the error flagged by JOSM. In addition the wiki also states that the tag can only be used on nodes and closed ways.

Hi. You inserted roads with the tag "parking=streetside". JOSM flags a problem as the tagging is not conform to the wiki page "parking=streetside".
Please have a look.

Many walls in this changeset are fences.
Please check also position of these objects. I suggest to use Strava Global Heatmap as reference.

Forgot the important: thanks for picking up the spelling mistake

What is the base of your retagging? I am aware of the approved proposal cycle_barrier=*, but that does not mention "chicane" as value. According to the new wiki page this is a "cycle_barrier=double".

La rotatoria Via Puccini non è visibile su Bing Maps

Hi. I noticed that you changed many nodes with kerb=raised by adding barrier=kerb (example node/7326738713 version2).
This seems to be redundant tagging. The wiki page kerb=* explicitly describe the tagging without the tag barrier=kerb, but mentions your tagging as an open issue. Has that issue been solved? Where is it documented?
Also with regards to this specific changeset: why did you not change the close-by node node/7326738714 ?

Hi.
You put psv=no on way/28014851.
I would say that is not correct, as taxies cold pick up and set down customers in that road.
Volker

Hai cambiato la way/58716844 come privato a non accessibile. Quale è la fonte per queste informazioni? Se sei stato sul posto sarebbe utile aggiungere una fonte al changeset. Il formato è source=survey in questo caso. La chiave source si utilizza di solito sul changeset, ma puoi anche inserirlo direttamente sull'oggetto in questione.
Volker (Padova)

Another note: Please do not use Google Maps for OSM data. This is violating our license.

way/1053281495 is not a New York subway, I think

fixed - thank you

Regarding relations 6085519: I don't think it is correct to give to a landuse polygon within the Colli Berici the name of the group of hills. The Colli Berici include areas that have a different landuse.

I have just updated the mapping to what I think is correct.
You can see details on Mapillary, including the bicycle oneway arrows (on https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=332912838168658)

Yes, I know that. But the two foot-cycle lanes are onewy in opposite directions. I am complaining that you removed that information. If you had done a survey, as your changeset comment claims, you would have seen that immediately.

Why are you adding thousands of bus=yes all over the place? This is incorrect tagging, as highway=bus_stop is _near_ the highway, but not _on_ the highway that the bus runs on. The same is true for public_transport=platform. Please stop immediately. See also https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/7524

Lungargine San Lazzaro (751638003, v2) (the first one on the list of ways for this changeset)