Many walls in this changeset are fences.
Please check also position of these objects. I suggest to use Strava Global Heatmap as reference.

Forgot the important: thanks for picking up the spelling mistake

What is the base of your retagging? I am aware of the approved proposal cycle_barrier=*, but that does not mention "chicane" as value. According to the new wiki page this is a "cycle_barrier=double".

La rotatoria Via Puccini non è visibile su Bing Maps

Hi. I noticed that you changed many nodes with kerb=raised by adding barrier=kerb (example node/7326738713 version2).
This seems to be redundant tagging. The wiki page kerb=* explicitly describe the tagging without the tag barrier=kerb, but mentions your tagging as an open issue. Has that issue been solved? Where is it documented?
Also with regards to this specific changeset: why did you not change the close-by node node/7326738714 ?

Hi.
You put psv=no on way/28014851.
I would say that is not correct, as taxies cold pick up and set down customers in that road.
Volker

Hai cambiato la way/58716844 come privato a non accessibile. Quale è la fonte per queste informazioni? Se sei stato sul posto sarebbe utile aggiungere una fonte al changeset. Il formato è source=survey in questo caso. La chiave source si utilizza di solito sul changeset, ma puoi anche inserirlo direttamente sull'oggetto in questione.
Volker (Padova)

Another note: Please do not use Google Maps for OSM data. This is violating our license.

way/1053281495 is not a New York subway, I think

fixed - thank you

Regarding relations 6085519: I don't think it is correct to give to a landuse polygon within the Colli Berici the name of the group of hills. The Colli Berici include areas that have a different landuse.

I have just updated the mapping to what I think is correct.
You can see details on Mapillary, including the bicycle oneway arrows (on https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=332912838168658)

Yes, I know that. But the two foot-cycle lanes are onewy in opposite directions. I am complaining that you removed that information. If you had done a survey, as your changeset comment claims, you would have seen that immediately.

Why are you adding thousands of bus=yes all over the place? This is incorrect tagging, as highway=bus_stop is _near_ the highway, but not _on_ the highway that the bus runs on. The same is true for public_transport=platform. Please stop immediately. See also https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/7524

Lungargine San Lazzaro (751638003, v2) (the first one on the list of ways for this changeset)

What is the source for the data that you added in this changeset?

Hi, why have you removed the bicycle-lane oneway information on way/751638003?

Hi,
please be careful with StreetCompl,ete armchair mapping. On way/38631394, which is part of several important cycle routes, you removed the contra-flow bicycle use, which I had mapped. See Mapillary image https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=530037734664501

Dove si trova documentazione della variante M1a (relazione 13909584)? C'è segnaletica sul terreno?

Hai il permesso del giornale di utilizzare il loro materiale? Normalmente materiale pubblicato da giornali è coperto da copyright e non può essere utilizzato in OSM.