vorpalblade's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 108679380 | I'm probably going to revert this changeset for the following reasons: 1) The new address is wrong (1st street is 7 blocks west)
|
|
| 108684967 | A couple of comments:
Just an FYI, I *have* georeferenced all the major imagery sources in the area using the imagery offset database. Unfortunately, the editor you are using doesn't pull from that database, and JOSM requires a plugin for that. Anyway, just so you know, Mesa County GIS has allowed us to use their (much more) up to date imagery for tracing in OpenStreetMap. You can see it by clicking on the "Background Settings" button in iD (keyboard shortcut "b") and select "Mesa County GIS Valleywide 2018". JOSM also has access to the 2019 (County wide) and 2020 (Grand Valley) aerial photos with the names starting as "Mesa County GIS". Thanks for your contributions,
|
|
| 108852744 | Hi there. It is nice to see someone else editing in this area using StreetComplete. It does look like you might have just been visiting, based off of your editing activity. If you ever to edit using JOSM in the area, I *have* georeferenced all the major imagery providers using survey monuments in the imagery offset database. And Mesa County GIS has allowed us to use their (much more) up to date imagery for tracing in OpenStreetMap. Thanks for your contributions,
|
|
| 109180752 | Just an FYI, I *have* georeferenced all the available imagery using the imagery offset database. Unfortunately, the editor you are using doesn't pull from that database, and JOSM requires a plugin for that. Anyway, just so you know, Mesa County GIS has allowed us to use their (much more) up to date imagery for tracing in OpenStreetMap. You can see it by clicking on the "Background Settings" button in iD (keyboard shortcut "b") and select "Mesa County GIS Valleywide 2018". JOSM also has access to the 2019 (County wide) and 2020 (Grand Valley) aerial photos with the names starting as "Mesa County GIS". Thanks for your contributions,
|
|
| 109507476 | Just an FYI, but please do *not* align geometry to any of the global imageries (ESRI, Maxar, etc.) in this local area _without_ getting an offset. I have a few offsets in the imagery offset db ~15 miles away set to a survey monument. There are also local imageries available (Mesa County GIS NAIP 2019) which is (a) clearer and (b) more accurate. |
|
| 110438974 | For traffic signals on oneways, you really don't need to add `traffic_signals:direction`. (See the traffic signals at the intersection of West Aspen Avenue and South Cherry Street). Anyway, just so you know, Mesa County GIS has allowed us to use their (much more) up to date imagery for tracing in OpenStreetMap. You can see it by clicking on the "Background Settings" button in iD (keyboard shortcut "b") and select "Mesa County GIS Valleywide 2018". You may also want to take a look at "Mapbox Satellite". JOSM also has access to the 2019 (County wide) and 2020 (Grand Valley) aerial photos with the names starting as "Mesa County GIS". Thanks for your contributions,
|
|
| 110446954 | Please pay attention to your warnings. Specifically, the crossing highway warning. I fixed this issue in changeset/110536485 . |
|
| 110449212 | Just an FYI, I *have* georeferenced all the available imagery using the imagery offset database. As you are a professional editor (based off of the iD host), you should try to use the best available imagery in each area you edit, with the appropriate offsets. The nearest survey monument I've aligned the standard imagery to is ~1 mile north of this edit location. Unfortunately, the editor you are using doesn't pull from that database, and JOSM requires a plugin for that. Anyway, just so you know, Mesa County GIS has allowed us to use their (much more) up to date imagery for tracing in OpenStreetMap. You can see it by clicking on the "Background Settings" button in iD (keyboard shortcut "b") and select "Mesa County GIS Valleywide 2018". You may also want to take a look at "Mapbox Satellite". JOSM also has access to the 2019 (County wide) and 2020 (Grand Valley) aerial photos with the names starting as "Mesa County GIS". Thanks for your contributions,
|
|
| 109225606 | Comment should be "Add minspeeds" |
|
| 107925717 | I didn't see anything off -- I just saw `iD 2.19.6` which doesn't integrate with the layer offset db, and I figured I'd point it out due to the use of `improve alignment` in the comment. That and "Bing" as an imagery source. I do have some aerial imagery in Palisade I need to process so that I can add some offset points there, but aligning to Strava traces should help a lot (compared to non-aligned imagery). |
|
| 107925717 | Just an FYI, I *have* georeferenced all the available imagery using the imagery offset database. Unfortunately, the editor you are using doesn't pull from that database, and JOSM requires a plugin for that. Anyway, just so you know, Mesa County GIS has allowed us to use their (much more) up to date imagery for tracing in OpenStreetMap. You can see it by clicking on the "Background Settings" button in iD (keyboard shortcut "b") and select "Mesa County GIS Valleywide 2018". You may also want to take a look at "Mapbox Satellite". JOSM also has access to the 2019 (County wide) and 2020 (Grand Valley) aerial photos with the names starting as "Mesa County GIS". Thanks for your contributions,
|
|
| 108279130 | Just so you know, different imagery's have different real-world offsets. I *have* georeferenced all the available imagery using the imagery offset database. I don't know if you used the plugin for JOSM. Anyway, just so you know, Mesa County GIS has allowed us to use their (much more) up to date imagery for tracing in OpenStreetMap. You can see it by clicking on the "Background Settings" button in iD (keyboard shortcut "b") and select "Mesa County GIS Valleywide 2018". You may also want to take a look at "Mapbox Satellite". JOSM also has access to the 2019 (County wide) and 2020 (Grand Valley) aerial photos with the names starting as "Mesa County GIS". Thanks for your contributions,
|
|
| 105381992 | Quick question for you: which image did you use to verify the road signs?
|
|
| 104599605 | No worries -- I just did not want you to spend a lot of time realigning stuff to later discover that it was pointless. The Mesa County imagery is pretty good (<2m to reality), so if something is wildly off from that, you can probably move it. Or if it is a road imported from TIGER (look for the `tiger:reviewed=no` tag). Also, if you (a) have an android phone and (b) like walking, you can take a look at StreetComplete. The iD editor (what you used for this changeset) is pretty friendly for new editors, so don't worry about messing things up too badly. Just don't do mass edits (e.g., convert all `building=house` into `building=yes`). If it helps, I do watch Mesa County for changesets not my own, and often comment. |
|
| 104599605 | Just so you know, different imagery's have different real-world offsets, so absent an imagery with a known-good offset, don't bother moving buildings like this. I *have* georeferenced all the available imagery using the imagery offset database. Unfortunately, the editor you are using doesn't pull from that database, and JOSM requires a plugin for that. Anyway, just so you know, Mesa County GIS has allowed us to use their (much more) up to date imagery for tracing in OpenStreetMap. You can see it by clicking on the "Background Settings" button in iD (keyboard shortcut "b") and select "Mesa County GIS Valleywide 2018". You may also want to take a look at "Mapbox Satellite". JOSM also has access to the 2019 (County wide) and 2020 (Grand Valley) aerial photos with the names starting as "Mesa County GIS". Thanks for your contributions,
|
|
| 104599926 | Hello, I dropped the description you added to 1911 North 10th Street (generally speaking, `description` and `name` aren't on `building=residential`, and this does not look like an exception). If you want to add the unit numbers, feel free. :) |
|
| 104599950 | Thanks for this update -- I moved the name over to a pitch that enclosed the pitch you edited, and deleted the pitch you modified. I did reference this changeset so that someone can follow the history back. |
|
| 104600074 | A few notes on this change:
Also, just so you know, Mesa County GIS has allowed us to use their (much more) up to date imagery for tracing in OpenStreetMap. You can see it by clicking on the "Background Settings" button in iD (keyboard shortcut "b") and select "Mesa County GIS Valleywide 2018". You may also want to take a look at "Mapbox Satellite". JOSM also has access to the 2019 (County wide) and 2020 (Grand Valley) aerial photos with the names starting as "Mesa County GIS". Thanks for your contributions,
|
|
| 104342847 | No problem. It was your first edit, after all. :) |
|
| 104342847 | iD can square buildings with `Q`, so they are better/more accurate. It also looks like these should be tagged as `building=static_caravan` (mobile homes) instead of `building=house`. Just so you know, Mesa County GIS has allowed us to use their (much more) up to date imagery for tracing in OpenStreetMap. You can see it by clicking on the "Background Settings" button in iD (keyboard shortcut "b") and select "Mesa County GIS Valleywide 2018". You may also want to take a look at "Mapbox Satellite". Unfortunately, the previous year that covers this area of the county is kind of bad in this location. (IIRC, it was for the National Agriculture Imagery Program.) JOSM also has access to the 2019 (County wide) and 2020 (Grand Valley) aerial photos with the names starting as "Mesa County GIS". Thanks for your contributions,
|