OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
167692164

Hi. Seriously what is wrong? You can map without problem a forest over scrub/grass/farmland, scrub over grass. It is a scrub that grows on grass, etc... We do that over years, it is perfectly correct.
Using multipoly in these trivial cases is overcomplicated.

168972117

:D
a to parkovisko vpravo zmizlo?

168972117

Servus. Toto je co za nezmysel?

168273134

nice ;)

167837114

Servus. Nieco zle na predchadzajucom changesete?

168273134

Hi, isn't the 'destination' rather for the next way?
way/25279491

62732224

Hi all.
A note: mapy.cz renders lots of things badly (e.g. bridge areas, guideposts...). I'd consider it as a bug in mapy.cz. See the discussion in the note:

note/4091245

167692875

Osmand does exit at the right point. -> nope, you have to "pre-exit" at the junction point

it is still possible in reality to change vehicle to the rightmost lane to take the exit. -> nope, that is illegal and dangerous. Full line is a barrier to respect.

167692875

There is nothing wrong mapping this way. In some states (NL or DK i think) people map individual lanes. There is nothing wrong mapping also for logic, not only look, map is also used for navigation.

167692875

GPS is not precise enough to distinguish in which lane you are currently driving (especially at 130kph) -> lane yes, the exit point will be missed . You have to exit first to the side lane and then exit. The exit point is marked with junction point.

167692875

Hi. Now it is more correct. The full line creates a separate barrier for the whole junction. So technically this junction is equivalent to the junction with barriers.
Old design would also not work for most navigations (osmand, organic maps, osrm, valhalla, ...)
For example just the 1st exit would be incorrectly at node/12919238473 :
https://osmand.net/map/navigate/?start=48.588414,18.902358&end=48.590667,18.895074&profile=car#18/48.58935/18.89884

even worse when exiting south.
The links north and south are logically only connected ot the side lanes(links), and not to the main road.

160019066

Hello?

164624768

ok we fixed it. plz be more careful next time ;)

165163457

I've changed the link to highway, should solve nav. issues.
Please consider also the map logic before changing tags/geometry ;)

165163457

Hi. This is a split ↖↗.
So either we add turn lanes or change both highways to highway or slink. Otherwise the righ split will be interpreted as exit and the left part as abolutely nothing.

144450099

;)

160019066

Zdravim. Toto je co za divoky changeset?

node/2802996387

node/2430303154

node/2685257493

Nedava to absolutne zmysel.

164624768

note/4733659

Tracked here

164624768

Wtf man? You removed the whole block of buildings.

163543366

Dunno what data consumer want to do with it. They have to use unicode anyway and if they want to process the text only, they have to filter the text in advance anyway (e.g. removing slashes, backslashes, triple dots, en/em-dashes ...)