user_5359's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 172926928 | Hello! Please have a look on relation/222096/. What is the mean of the very long key? Is this a copy and paste error? Did you mean the key colour? |
|
| 172929121 | Hello! Please have a look on relation/19684976. What is the mean of the tags
|
|
| 172887170 | Hello! Please have a look on way/1435767414 (one of 6,787 objetcs). What is the meaning of the tags
|
|
| 172891160 | Hello! Please have a look on way/1435797024 . What is the mean of the tags
|
|
| 172873559 | Hello! Please have a look on way/1435680728. What is the mean of the tags
|
|
| 172687072 | Hello! Quick question. The references for nature reserves also mention the federal state. See https://taginfo.osm.org/search?q=NSG. Is there a reason why you are not including this information? Hallo! Kurze Nachfrage. Bei den Referenzen der Naturschutzgebieten wird auch das Bundesland genannt. Siehe https://taginfo.osm.org/search?q=NSG. Gibt es einen Grund, dass Du darauf verzichtest? |
|
| 172723788 | Hello! Short question: What is the difference between the keys ref:FR:CD63 and (the new) ref:FR:CD74? See alsohttps://taginfo.osm.org/search?q=FR%3ACD.
Bonjour ! Petite question : quelle est la différence entre les codes ref:FR:CD63 et (le nouveau) ref:FR:CD74 ? Voir également https://taginfo.osm.org/search?q=FR%3ACD .
|
|
| 172869614 | Hello! Is there a reason why you are using the key ref:NL:BGT (see https://taginfo.osm.org/search?q=BGT) instead of ref:bgt? If the NL is to be included, then ref:NL:bgt would be the more appropriate notation. Hallo! Is er een reden waarom je in plaats van ref:bgt de sleutel ref:NL:BGT (zie https://taginfo.osm.org/search?q=BGT) gebruikt? Als de NL erbij hoort, zou ref:NL:bgt toch de meer aangepaste schrijfwijze zijn. |
|
| 172920981 | I don't understand your reference to the wiki. The Wikidata value points to a park called Green Park. So the name of the park has been changed. |
|
| 172941161 | reduce advertising from description: changeset/172943967 |
|
| 172897257 | hello! Please be careful! You moved the node node/4941456378 (a street crossing) more than 100 meters over streets and buildings.
|
|
| 172893795 | I agree with you (but it wasn't clear without further information). I have changed the key elements as follows:
|
|
| 172913321 | remove description under changeset/172928904. |
|
| 172868731 | There is no entry in the wiki about this, and the forum is not required reading.
|
|
| 172881489 | Welcome to OSM! I reverted you entry, because your business isn't part of te street. |
|
| 172891387 | Unfortunately, I had to revert your first attempt at ALPR monitoring because the entry didn't make sense. I found an example that might serve as a good template: node/13160901909. |
|
| 172873570 | Welcome to OSM! I reverted your change set, because there is no address and business description. |
|
| 171751176 | That is indeed my mistake. I'm sorry, but after 25 days I can no longer remember what caused the change. Probably the same reason why you created the name user_2539 from my name user_5359. :) |
|
| 172865112 | Welcome to OSM! I can't assign this message because essential information is missing. However, a surveillance camera from Flock has been entered correctly. |
|
| 172865223 | Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on node/12057907887. Is this also a Flock camera? |