No no ci ho fatto caso e gli ho corretti. Però adesso che ci penso hai ragione, mi sa che mi sono dimenticato di correggere quelli relativi ai negozi. My bad.

Probabilmente il risultato di un'unione tra due way

Ho sbagliato a scrivere

I was talking about the relation. If there was a language on the node and another on the relation is worse. I fixed these inconsistencies, you say that the node had a history of changing back and forth between latin and italian, if we have both there is no longer reason to change the name.

But this is not an argument since previously the name was latin only. I added italian because also italian is official language there.

I would opt for suburb.

It can be tagged as a neighbourhood (?)

I changed name to including the latin and italian name because this nation has these languages as official languages, as it is customary in nations or territories with more than one official language.
I deleted the city_block because it didn't make sense, as there is already this relation relation/11989610 that describes the same thing; the tags from the node can be added to the relation.
My reasoning in changing Vatican City to city is this:
1. to follow the wiki page description of city (Use the place=city tag to identify the largest settlement or settlements within a territory)
2. It is a CITY-state (this is a rather weak argument, I admit)
3. It has city in the name
If these points are not valid I suggest tagging it as a village instead of a town, because it hasn't the number of inhabitants of a town.
The options in my opinion are these: tagging it as city because it's a national capital after all, or tagging it as a village because it has a low number of residents.

Questa osm.org/map=18/45.54336/9.08496 e questa osm.org/#map=19/45.54475/9.08343 non sono aree di parcheggio.

And yes of course I'm gonna revert these deletions.

Can I be excused for not wanting to talk to the wall anymore?
It's the last time: I said: I'VE CHANGED SURFACE PARKINGS TO STREET_SIDE BECAUSE I THOUGHT IT WAS BETTER. Is it more clear if I write it in uppercase?

Comunque okay d'accordo.

Non perché non capisca bene l'inglese ma perché essendo tutti italiani è più facile leggere e scrivere un testo nella lingua madre. Prende meno RAM mentale

Puoi parlare anche in italiano

I've not deleted any parkings. I've changed surface parkings to street_side because I thought it was better. With that said I changed my mind, as you can see reported on this: changeset/115535540 changeset discussion.

È quello che ho detto io comunque

Fa testo la wiki

D'accordo, mi hai convinto. Detto questo di sicuro usare i parking_space come fa ivanbranco è sbagliato. amenity=parking_space
a single parking space on a parking lot.

Please link me this changeset discussion in which I hadn't replied ("like you did now"???? I said I didn't read these messages until now)

Questa cosa permette solo di avere più granularità. I parcheggi surface servono come prima stesura, come mettere un building come nodo, ma sono molto imprecisi.