Hi. Awesome to see the SI mapped here!

But unfortunately, you somehow managed to break two large forest multipolygons (one is relation/2794193) by removing the line way/217836819 (which was used as an artificial split-line between the two forest polygons) from the multipolygon relations. Didn't you get a warning from JOSM that this line was part of relations? It would be nice if you could pay a little bit more attention next time. :)

PS: I've already repaired the forests by now!

and note/859489

source was note/859488

Thanks @sladen!

Hi. Thanks for the fixes.

For your information: The user who contributed this erroneous data was more "active" in the vicinity (and elsewhere), making more problematic edits. I think I've reverted all the remaining problematic edits in the meantime.

Hi. Thanks for the fixes.

For your information: The user who contributed this erroneous data was more "active" in the vicinity (and elsewhere). I think I've reverted all the remaining problematic edits in the meantime.

Hi. No worries!

To your question: If you need a custom map style (e.g. one without road names), you should look at one of the many options to render your own map from OpenStreetMap data. Depending on what you need a map for, different tools or services can do the trick. For example "Maperitive" is relatively easy to use and produces static png maps as output, or you can look at what mapbox.com has to offer for your use-case. Here's a related page on the osm wiki with more information: osm.wiki/Rendering

Hi ET90!

Why did you remove all these names from roads in the industrial area "Bolzano Sud"? It looks like a mistake to me. I will restore the names for now. Can you please explain what you wanted to do here? I think we can give you a helping hand. :)

Hi! Wieso hast du hier die ganzen Geschäfte/Lokale gelöscht? Wahrscheinlich ein Versehen, oder? Ich stelle die Objekte schnell wieder her.

PS: Willkommen bei OSM! :)

Ich denke das ist ein Doppel-Account eines anderen Users der seit ein paar Wochen leider Probleme macht :( siehe osm.org/user_blocks/1150

Hmm. Yes, but if I were the next editor, I wouldn't know how to use your data. In fact, it would possibly even hinder any further editing: for example, I wouldn't know if I can remove these lines that don't correspond to any actual feature on the ground or not.

While I partially understand the motivation behind keeping the two circles (e.g. way/464954584)*, for me it is totally unclear what the remaining lines are good for. For example: way/465011450 or way/464954580 – can you explain why we need those? If yes: at least, please add a note tag explaining how they are intended to be used by your fellow mappers.

My point is that if only you know how to use it, that data is indistinguishable from garbage for everyone else. You can't compare that to OSM's GPS traces, where the functionality and intended usage is well documented. Thanks for understanding. :)

* but even those could be redrawn very quickly by the next mapper in case they want to adjust the tracks while keeping the perfect round shape.

sorry, I don't get it. Why would it make sense to keep your "templates" in the DB? Couldn't you just store them in a local .osm file on your PC, if you need them again at some point in the future?

PS: You can see them on Osmose: http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/map/#item=5070&class=50703&zoom=10&lat=46.8249&lon=12.472&layer=Mapnik&overlays=FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFT

Many of the housenames around here have invalid characters in them. Example: way/136004208

lol

OK, no problem! I've reverted this changeset now in changeset/45055894.

@Sentiero Italia:

As the route is so long, it is mapped as several relations (one for each of the 368 "tappe", here's an example: relation/2805907). See this wiki page for more information: osm.wiki/Sentiero_Italia

PS: I've also restored this road, which was (I assume accidentally) deleted in this changeset: way/288546535

Hi Gerd! Can you please explain what you tried to do in this changeset? For example, what is this line good for: way/464613476 ?

nice work. thanks!

I've used "market:shop" for now, as I'm not aware of a better one.