Thanks <3
Fixed in changeset/74259148

Ah, sorry. Hatte den Weg falsch im Kopf. Danke für den Hinweis. Ist in osm.org/edit?changeset=74252224 ausgebessert

Hallo. Kann es sein, dass jetzt das "Apartement Hotel Matscher" jetzt doppelt eingetragen? Neben dem neuen way/106833025 gab es den Betrieb bereits in node/641810261 wenn ich das richtig sehe.

PS: correction for my point 1 above – node/926004477 seems to be the address node for this. Sorry, I overlooked it at first. Still, the node doesn't contain any connection to the camping as a whole, so point 2 is still valid for this case.

> automatically imported and updated from a government database. So you should not go about editing Danish addresses manually.

Hi! I'm wondering about this statement:

1. How does this matter in the situation here? In this specific case the "official dataset" the Address of the camping ("Aalbækvej 288 · DK-9982 Aalbæk", as seen on the website of the camping) doesn't seem to be contained in the official dataset or was not imported properly into OSM. Isn't an address on the outline better than no address at all?

2. Even if the address was already present in OSM as a point, isn't it still be a good idea to have the address information also on the POI itself (here: the camping site), so that a user that is searching for the camping can find out the official address of the business (e.g. for sending a letter to it).

3. And more generally: Isn't OpenStreetMap all about collaboration and starts with the principle that everyone can edit anything? What good is a dataset in OSM if you're not allowed to edit it? Couldn't it just have been left as an outside dataset in that case?

PSS: Here you also have re-created one fuel station that I've deleted on purpose last week because the import location was wrong (or very much outdated) and the fuel station was already mapped in OSM at the correct location.

This is my changeset: changeset/61958402 and this the re-created fuel POI: node/5856448319

I believe you should keep track of which fuel stations you have already uploaded and not create them again when they have been deleted on purpose by OSM mappers.

PS: Any reason why you used another account to upload these changes and not "attilaimport" (as in your first two changesets, e.g. changeset/61948858) as described in osm.wiki/Import/Catalogue/ItalyFuelStations#Dedicated_upload_account

Hi. A few questions: way/385683058 looks odd: A building way with only two nodes? It looks like you probably used outdated OSM data for the conflation process?! It looks like this osm way would have been the right one to update: way/618949575

see changeset/58166692

Hallo. Danke für deinen Beitrag zu OSM! Ein paar kleinere Mängel sind mir hier allerdings aufgefallen:

1) du hast die Tags des "Hotel Wilma" (wahrscheinlich versehentlich) auf einen Knoten des Gebäudeumrisses kopiert, sodass dieses jetzt doppelt in OSM ist: siehe node/1834724094/history und way/172582900

2) könntest du in Zukunft bitte Änderungen die weit voneinander entfernt sind (hier: die Änderungen um Nals und die Änderungen bei Tres) in separaten Changesets hochladen?

3) Ein kurzer Changeset-Kommentar wäre auch sehr hilfreich. ;) Hierzu kann ich folgende OSM-Wiki Seite empfehlen: osm.wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments

Hab jetzt erstmal das caravan_site Tag wieder entfernt (in changeset/60504740).

Hi. OK, verstehe. Es ist richtig dass hier hauptsächlich Wohnmobile geparkt sind. Ich glaube allerdings dass es sich hier eher um einen Abstellplatz eines Gebrauchtwagenhändlers oder Wohnmobilvermieters handelt. Auf einschlägigen Camping-Webseiten (meinwomo.net, campingplatz-suche.com) wird dieser Platz außerdem auch nicht aufgelistet.

Hallo. Bist du sicher, dass way/295668372 ein "richtiger" Wohnmobilstellplatz ("tourism=caravan_site") ist? Ein User hat in note/1394154 gemeldet, dass dieser nicht existieren soll, und aus eigener Erfahrung kenne ich diesen Platz auch nur als Langzeitparkplatz, der nicht zum Übernachten verwendet wird.

Hi, is way/533227581 really a tunnel all the way through?

Hi. I see you changed the electrification of the the Treviglio-Brescia high speed rail line from 25kV AC to 3kV DC. Is that really correct? Because many sources (e.g. http://www.ferrovie.it/portale/articoli/4400) indicate that it is actually a 25kV AC line (like most of the other newly constructed high speed rail lines in Italy). See also note/1440324

Non sono d'accordo. Quel sito può sbagliare (come per esempio indica il vecchio CAP di San Paolo). E penso che sarà meglio inserire gli indirizzi in OSM nella versione completa "ufficiale" (addr:city=Appiano + addr:hamlet=Cornaiano) e non in una versione abbreviata.

È stato discusso da qualche parte (magari sulla mailing list talk-it)?

Sei sicuro che tuttitalia.it è una fonte valida per OpenStreetMap?

Se leggo https://www.tuttitalia.it/note-legali/ correttamente, si deve "sempre citare" il loro sito come fonte dei dati, che non è sempre possibile in OSM (vedi la situazione della CC-BY su: osm.wiki/Import/ODbL_Compatibility)

> addr:postcode dovrebbe essere 39050

No, 39057 è coretto! San Paolo ha cambiato il suo CAP (da 39050 a 39057) circa 5 anni fa. Vedi
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/St._Pauls_(Eppan) o per esempio il sito del comune di Appiano: http://www.appiano.eu/system/web/gelbeseite.aspx?detailonr=92444455&menuonr=218513676&noseo=1&sprache=3

Ciao!

Sei sicuro che indicare "San Michele" direttamente come "addr:city" è una buona idea? Tipicamente qui si usa il nome del comune "Appiano" (o il nome della frazione piu il nome del comune – "San Michele / Appiano") per scrivere indirizzi, per esempio:

* "Piazza Municipio 1, I-39057 Appiano" (http://www.eppan.eu/system/web/default.aspx?sprache=3)

* "Via Madonna del Riposo 34 I-39057 Appiano (BZ) " (https://www.bagnara.net/it/)
* "via Johann Georg Plazer 22-24, Appiano" (http://www.musei-altoadige.it/it/musei.asp?muspo_id=1428)

* "Via Lamm 22 I-39057 Cornaiano/Appiano" (https://www.weinegg.com/it)

* "Via Castel Guardia 21 - 39057 San Paolo/Appiano" (https://www.stpauls.wine/it)

* …

Non ho mai visto un indirizzo di San Michele / Appiano scritto senza il nome del comune.

Anche su osm.wiki/IT:Key:addr leggo che nel campo "addr:city" si mette il nome del comune, e nel campo "addr:hamlet" si può mettere i nomi delle frazioni:

> addr:city – Nome della città, come indicata sull'indirizzo postale. Ridondante se corrisponde al nome del comune ricavabile dai confini. Vedere anche addr:hamlet=* per indicare una località supplementare.

PS: Was ist denn hier mit source=mapbox gemeint? Der Satelitenbild-Layer von Mapbox? Zur Info: Hier in der Gegend gibt es bessere alternativen, z.B. die Luftbilder der Provinz Bozen, die in der Regel deutlich aktueller, höher aufgelöst und genauer georeferenziert sind.